<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mashby &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mashby.com/category/entertainment/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mashby.com</link>
	<description>(aka Michael T. Ashby) my personal weblog on all the things that I&#039;m passionate about.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Palm Geek Chick Flick?</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2009/05/palm-geek-chick-flick/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2009/05/palm-geek-chick-flick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Holly is currently out-of-town, so you&#8217;d think that I&#8217;d have spent the whole weekend eating pizza, renting violent movies and sitting around in my underwear &#8212; you know, reverting back to adolescence while my better half is away. Surprisingly, I wore pants and did a bunch of small chores around the house. However, I did [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mashby.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/imageslittle-black-book.png" alt="little-black-book.png" border="0" width="212" height="387" align="right" />Holly is currently out-of-town, so you&#8217;d think that I&#8217;d have spent the whole weekend eating pizza, renting violent movies and sitting around in my underwear &#8212; you know, reverting back to adolescence while my better half is away. Surprisingly, I wore pants and did a bunch of small chores around the house. However, I did order a pizza and I did watch a few movies.</p>
<p>One of the movies I stumbled onto over the weekend was &#8220;<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361841/">Little Black Book</a>&#8221; Not a huge fan of the whole &#8220;chick flick&#8221; genre, you might be wondering why I watched it. Although Brittany Murphy may have been the star of the film, what hooked me was all the references to <a href="http://palm.com">Palm</a>. As my tag cloud can attest, I&#8217;ve been a bit of a fan over the years. I will admit that my passion for the platform has definitely waned over the last five years, going so far as to <a href="http://mashby.com/2008/12/bye-bye-miss-american-pie/">tell them goodbye</a>, but I couldn&#8217;t stop watching.</p>
<p>To some extent I was really doing nothing more than reliving the late heydays of Palm. I remember all the promotion that Palm put out on the film and how they felt that the <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/pdas/palm-tungsten-c/4505-3127_7-21120743.html">Palm Tungsten C</a> was one of the characters in the movie. Although that may be taking things a bit too far, it was definitely the star of the show in my eyes.</p>
<blockquote><p>
<a href="http://investor.palm.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=341826">palmOne Press Release</a></p>
<p>In &#8220;Little Black Book,&#8221; Stacy Holt (Brittany Murphy), an associate producer for daytime talk show hostess Kippie Kann (Kathy Bates), is frustrated when her boyfriend Derek (Ron Livingston) refuses to discuss his past relationships. With the encouragement of co-worker Barb (Holly Hunter), she delves into his palmOne<sup>&#8482;</sup> handheld to learn about his ex-girlfriends. The digital footprints of past and present romances are kept on a Tungsten<sup>&#8482;</sup> C handheld from palmOne. <strong>This little black book, used for work and play, is the technology star of the film.</strong>
</p></blockquote>
<p>The movie itself was mediocre at best. If they had used a Blackberry instead of a Palm, I wouldn&#8217;t have lasted more than 10 minutes before changing the channel. But they didn&#8217;t. They used a Palm and they used it through the film here-and-there. One of the more memorable scenes for me was where they were displaying a Palm application via a projector up on the wall. The image was obscured by the actors and they never actually made reference to it, so I can only assume that it was used in an earlier scene that was deleted, but you could clearly see a few soft buttons and an outline of the user interface. It literally made me catch my breath.</p>
<p>As silly as it may sound, what dawned on me was just how much I used to be <em>IN LOVE</em> with Palm OS. There she was &#8212; Palm OS &#8212; right at her peak, still vibrant and full of potential, in a major Hollywood movie and she looked fantastic. The Commodore 64 may have been my first crush on technology, but the Palm Pilot was my first true love and seeing the actors make references to it and for her display to appear on screen just brought it all back. </p>
<p>It was like seeing photos of your first girlfriend and remembering how great it was back then. Today you&#8217;ve both grown older and gone your separate ways, but to recall that time in your lives when everything just clicked and it is so delightfully delicious to recall. At a commercial break, I closed my eyes to hold onto that memory as long as I could. It was like savoring a single bite of a desert long forgotten. You hold onto it with all your senses as it slowly dissolves away and then you swallow and there&#8217;s nothing left.</p>
<p>To drive the analogy into the ground, Palm has since let herself go and <a href="http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/8109/palm-and-microsoft-announce-windows-mobile-treo/">left me for someone new</a> a few years ago. She&#8217;s now but a glimmer of her former self and I stopped calling because it was just to painful to see her like that. Of course she has a younger sister, the <a href="http://www.palm.com/us/products/phones/pre/">Palm Pr&#233;</a>, which everyone is excited about, but that&#8217;s not the one you fell in love with. </p>
<p>Besides, I think to myself, I&#8217;ve moved on and I&#8217;m in a happy and committed relationship with my iPhone. Our relationship is stable and secure and even after two years, we&#8217;re still acting like we&#8217;re dating. There&#8217;s so much stuff to see and do that there simply isn&#8217;t enough time in the day.</p>
<p>But every so often, I hear a beep, or see a certain squarish oblong button and I&#8217;m instantly taken back to the days when technology was a little bit simpler and the world was still eagerly waiting to be conquered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2009/05/palm-geek-chick-flick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bathtub IV Video</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2009/03/bathtub-iv-video/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2009/03/bathtub-iv-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tilt-shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going through my tweets after lunch and found a comment by Merlin Mann. He was replying to Graham Linehan, the creator of The IT Crowd so naturally I had to follow him (@Glinner if you&#8217;re interested). As I scrolled through page-after-page of videos and links of utter hilarity, I came across this video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going through my tweets after lunch and found a comment by Merlin Mann. He was replying to Graham Linehan, the creator of <a href="http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-it-crowd">The IT Crowd</a> so naturally I had to follow him (@<a href="http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-it-crowd">Glinner</a> if you&#8217;re interested).</p>
<p>As I scrolled through page-after-page of videos and links of utter hilarity, I came across this video that I just had to share. Bathtub IV is one in a series of videos from Keith Loutit&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://vimeo.com/channels/keithloutitssydney">Little Sydney</a>&#8221; project and it&#8217;s just brilliant.</p>
<p><object width="400" height="225"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3156959&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=3156959&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="225"></embed></object><br /><a href="http://vimeo.com/3156959">Bathtub IV</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/keithloutit">Keith Loutit</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><em>Note: this is not stop motion, and these are not models.</em> I showed this to <a href="http://pleasantlyconfused.com">Dan</a> and we talked about it and how Keith created this fantastic video. Seems that he&#8217;s shooting HD and combing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilt-shift_photography">tilt-shift</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_lapse">time-lapse</a>. Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2009/03/bathtub-iv-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Favorite &#8220;Superman Returns&#8221; Review</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2006/07/my-favorite-superman-returns-review/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2006/07/my-favorite-superman-returns-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We saw Superman Returns at the Stardust Drive-in last night and I _loved_ it. Instead of waxing poetic on the whys and what nots, I think the following review sums it up perfectly...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/superman_returns.jpg" width="163" height="110"  hspace="6" alt="Superman Returns" align="left" />We saw <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0348150/">Superman Returns</a> at the <a href="http://www.stardustdrivein.com/">Stardust Drive-in</a> last night and I <em>loved</em> it. Instead of waxing poetic on the whys and what nots, I think the following review sums it up perfectly &#8212; <a href="http://pvponline.com/archive.php3?archive=20060702">PVP Online</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2006/07/my-favorite-superman-returns-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rendezvous</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2006/04/rendezvous/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2006/04/rendezvous/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google video film ferrari paris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend of mine sent me an e-mail this morning with a link to a Google Video and I just _HAD_ to share it. The video is a short film by Claude Lelouch entitled C'&#233;tait un rendez-vous.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pleasantlyconfused.com">A friend of mine</a> sent me an e-mail this morning with a link to a Google Video and I just <em>HAD</em> to share it. The video is a short film by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0500988/">Claude Lelouch</a> entitled <strong>C&#8217;&#233;tait un rendez-vous</strong>.</p>
<p>The film was shot in 1976 on the streets of Paris. Lelouch mounted a gyro-stabilized camera to the bumper of a <a href="http://www.allsportauto.com/english/ferrari_275_gtb.php">Ferrari 275 GTB</a> and had a professional Formula 1 driver race it from Porte Dauphine, past the Louvre to the Basilica of Sacre Coeur. The entire course was completed in about 9 minutes, with the driver reaching 140 miles per hour in some sections. If you watch the film closely, you&#8217;ll see him run red lights, nearly hit real pedestrians and going the wrong way up one-way streets. Remember, <em>the streets were NOT closed</em>, because Lelouch was unable to obtain a permit for the filming.</p>
<p>After the first public viewing of the film, Lelouch was promptly arrested. He never released the name of the driver, but according to IMDB the Formula 1 driver and personal friend of Lelouch is <a href="http://www.grandprix.com/gpe/drv-beljea.html">Jean-Pierre Beltoise</a>.</p>
<p>Having ridden many of the streets shot in the film, during a month I spent in Paris, I found this film to be absolutly terrifying. Granted, I rode the streets by bicycle, where my top speed was probably 20mph, versus the 120mph in the film. It&#8217;s completely dangereous, reckless and stupid &#8211; but it&#8217;s a lot of fun to watch. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span id="more-395"></span><br />
<embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" align="middle" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvp.video.google.com%2Fvideodownload%3Fversion%3D0%26secureurl%3DlwAAANkXZrVNuT6CNbPjGoY0O7cZP44hMbOSrER8D6VTm5L6pcvAjx2u3ymWPAucD3yjv3AYLa9lC34Rz5Pgy1K4UpD5E95NZloyY3kyC_dk5tKiLYgbbP2_yLvqtZ6wsNaTiRq3pChKl-l_uaYuzjTofd77M4M9KHWTKHN_EN-AtwG04HxrjxYOloRu_G4qFCrK9X4J7KMFTbBBnMxT89_mzkE%26sigh%3Dl1_waVRC_MUaSQBCn8_MFs1wFAs%26begin%3D0%26len%3D519599%26docid%3D2851488008488190547&#038;thumbnailUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fvideo.google.com%2FThumbnailServer%3Fapp%3Dvss%26contentid%3De19be60cb4080c87%26second%3D5%26itag%3Dw320%26urlcreated%3D1145732352%26sigh%3DcfesK2f4HukcItL8_BJHZEvOy5w&#038;playerId=2851488008488190547" allowScriptAccess="sameDomain" quality="best" bgcolor="#ffffff" scale="noScale" wmode="window" salign="TL"  FlashVars="playerMode=embedded"> </embed></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2006/04/rendezvous/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perfect Clip For A Monday Morning</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2006/02/perfect-clip-for-a-monday-morning/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2006/02/perfect-clip-for-a-monday-morning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found this clip this morning courtesy of my good friend Kerry Woo and I just had to share it. If you've ever seen the cult classic movie Office Space, this is a video using the "SuperFriends" with some of the choice audio from Office Space overdubbed. It's a wicked combination that makes for a nice Monday pickup.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src='http://www.vsocial.com/v/5a03232f1c98fd45479e7b4dd42cbe54' height='286' width='330' align="center"></embed></p>
<p>Found this clip this morning courtesy of my good friend <a href="http://wonderdawg777.blogspot.com/2006/02/office-space-office-friends.html">Kerry Woo</a> and I just had to share it. If you&#8217;ve ever seen the cult classic movie <em><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0151804/">Office Space</a></em>, this is a video using the &#8220;<a href="http://www.tv.com/superfriends/show/13644/summary.html?q=superfriends">SuperFriends</a>&#8221; with some of the choice audio from <em>Office Space</em>overdubbed. It&#8217;s a wicked combination that makes for a nice Monday pickup.</p>
<p>One small warning, <em>Office Space</em> was rated R, so some of the language is PG-13 or higher. So if you&#8217;re at YOUR office, I thought you might want to be aware of that fact before a few choice curse words flew out of your speakers. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2006/02/perfect-clip-for-a-monday-morning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About A Boy</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2004/06/about-a-boy/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2004/06/about-a-boy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 03:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first saw this movie while on a business trip to Chattanooga. I needed to finish up some work on a presentation I was making the next day and there was nothing on TV, so I decided to splurge and rent an On-Demand movie. Most of the movies I had either seen, or had no interest in seeing and just as I was about to turn it off, I came across About A Boy. I hadn't heard much buzz about the movie and I'm not a fan of Hugh Grant, but for reasons unknown to me, I rented it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00005JL7Q/qid%3D1086913076/sr%3D8-1"><img src="/images/posts/about_a_boy.gif" width="110" height="150" alt="Legally Blonde 2" border="1" hspace="6" align="left" /></a><strong>Director(s):</strong> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919363/">Chris Weitz</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919369/">Paul Weitz</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <A href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0394984/">Nick Hornby</a> (novel), <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0373282/">Peter Hedges</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919363/">Chris Weitz</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0919369/">Paul Weitz</a> (screenplay)<br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Drama / Comedy<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> Rated PG-13 for brief strong language and some thematic elements.<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 101 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> UK<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2002<br />
<strong>Plot:</strong> Based on <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/1573227331/qid%3D1086927598/sr%3D8-2">Nick Hornby&#8217;s popular British novel</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00005JL7Q/qid%3D1086913076/sr%3D8-1">About A Boy</a> is a comedy-drama starring <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000424/">Hugh Grant</a> as Will, a rich, child-free and irresponsible Londoner in his thirties who, in search of available women, invents an imaginary son and starts attending single parent meetings. As a result of one of his liaisons, he meets Marcus, an odd 12-year-old boy with problems at school. Gradually, Will and Marcus become friends, and as Will teaches Marcus how to be a cool kid, Marcus helps Will to finally grow up.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong><br />
I first saw this movie while on a business trip to Chattanooga. I needed to finish up some work on a presentation I was making the next day and there was nothing on TV, so I decided to splurge and rent an On-Demand movie. Most of the movies I had either seen, or had no interest in seeing and just as I was about to turn it off, I came across <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00005JL7Q/qid%3D1086913076/sr%3D8-1">About A Boy</a>. I hadn&#8217;t heard much buzz about the movie and I&#8217;m not a fan of Hugh Grant, but for reasons unknown to me, I rented it.</p>
<p><span id="more-277"></span><br />
I was expecting another one of Hugh Grant&#8217;s saccharine romantic comedies where he plays a charming befuddling fop as he&#8217;s done ad nauseam since <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00000JRTX">Four Weddings And A Funereal</a>. Granted, I liked Four Weddings immensely, but by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B000023VTP">Notting Hill</a> I&#8217;d had my fill. Much to my surprise, Grant was playing a completely different character and was clearly attempting to break his mold. He&#8217;d done that once before in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00003CXT7">Bridget Jones&#8217; Diary</a>, where he played a jerk, but now he was taking it in another direction entirely. It&#8217;s a refreshing and more importantly <em>interesting</em> change.</p>
<p>But this movie isn&#8217;t all about Hugh Grant&#8217;s character Will. His co-star is new comer <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0396558/">Nicholas Hoult</a>, who plays the boy Marcus and he carries his own. Ultimately, the movie is about both of them, and so Hoult has the responsibility of carrying half the weight of the movie and he does a splendid job. Rounding out the cast is <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001057/">Toni Collette</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001838/">Rachel Weisz</a>, each do an excellent job as well. Suffice to say that the casting for this movie is brilliant. Each character is fully developed and rich with complexity and emotion. I bought each and every one of them. Not once did I feel that there was a weak link in the bunch. That&#8217;s also surprising because this type of movie is hard to pull off.</p>
<p>So what <em>kind</em> of movie is this? At it&#8217;s heart, this movie is a comedy. That being said, with subject matter such as suicide, it is most definitely a drama as well. That&#8217;s a fine line to walk in a film but Weitz Brothers deftly manage to pull it off. Granted their movie is based on the Hornby book by the same name, so they had a rich palette to begin with, but the brothers clearly rose to the challenge and created a fantastic movie. There have been plenty of good books that have been butchered at the box office and Boy is a rare exception. There&#8217;s no cliche&#8217; choices made by the characters and the director&#8217;s did a great job at staying true to the tone of the book. Chris and Paul also stretched themselves with their camera work and it pays off. If you&#8217;re into &#8220;film&#8221; there&#8217;s a lot to chew on between the use of jump cuts, depth of focus and swing shots. None of this gets in the way of the movie. If anything these camera techniques add to the performances and help tell the story.</p>
<p>Interweaving it&#8217;s way throughout the movie and in some cases almost playing a role in the film, is the music and it is spot on. All the music was written by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/stores/artist/glance/-/206011">Badly Drawn Boy</a> specifically for this movie. I was not familiar with the artist prior to seeing the film, but the director&#8217;s couldn&#8217;t have made a better choice. Although each song stands on it&#8217;s own on the soundtrack, each song also easily blends into the scene and lends a hand in creating just the right tone for the movie. After listening to the soundtrack, I could imagine it as simply a regular artist release, so it stands on it&#8217;s own. Yet when it&#8217;s worked into the movie it&#8217;s pure gold.</p>
<p>I absolutely love this movie. After my first watching I was reduced to a puddle of tears by the time the credits rolled. Yes I laughed. Yes the movie is very very funny, but it also touched me on a very deep level and emotions were bound to follow. In an odd sort of karmic journey, I happen to be taking a flight to San Jose the next week and the movie being shown was About A Boy. Having just seen it a few days before, I figured I&#8217;d pass on seeing it again so soon, but after the first scene, I was digging for my headphones to watch it again. Being that I was in public, I quietly wiped a few tears, but managed to keep it together. Upon returning from San Jose, Boy was being shown yet again and I watched it for a third time! In the space of two weeks, I had seen the movie three times. That&#8217;s definitely a first in my book.</p>
<p>So why do I like it so much? I&#8217;d like to think that I&#8217;m not alone in this, but it&#8217;s because I can relate to the movie on so many levels. There are so many scenes that I could describe, but in the end I would be retelling the entire movie. Every scene has something in it that is worth watching again and again. I can relate to Marcus as he&#8217;s picked on in school, tries to cope with his mother&#8217;s depression and ultimately knowingly faces complete and utter embarrassment as a last ditch effort to make his mother happy. The names and places have been changed to protect the innocent, but I&#8217;ve been there. Then there&#8217;s Will who has to finally face his demons and his father&#8217;s legacy in order to join the human race and be a part of other peoples lives. Although not an exact context, I&#8217;ve been there in one way shape or form.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, I caught myself watching it again the other day on DVD and it struck me that this movie is now in my Top 10, or dare I say Top 5 movie list. I maybe be borrowing from another fantastic Hornby book/movie <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00003CXGA/qid%3D1086928105/sr%3D1-1">High Fidelity</a>, but it&#8217;s true. It&#8217;s not Citizen Kane, but it is one of the best movies that takes a funny look at becoming a man through two different people. In trying to describe this movies to others, I&#8217;ve called it &#8220;A guy&#8217;s romantic comedy.&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t really nail it on the head, but I&#8217;d like to think that About A Boy, <em>IS</em> a guy&#8217;s movie. The subject matter may not have Rambo&#8217;s, or Rocky&#8217;s, but any guy who can think about something other than sports, or monster trucks should get something from this movie. It&#8217;s Hugh Grant&#8217;s best work to date. It&#8217;s based on a hugely successful book and it&#8217;s funny as hell. What&#8217;s not to like?</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/5stars.gif" width="" height="" border="0" alt="5 out of 5 Stars" /> (5 Out Of 5 Stars)<br />
<!-- <strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">link</a>] &#8211;></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2004/06/about-a-boy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legally Blonde 2: Red, White &amp; Blonde</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2004/02/legally-blonde-2-red-white-blonde/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2004/02/legally-blonde-2-red-white-blonde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a curse in the movie industry. It's name - the sequal. I forgot about this curse when I rented Legally Blond 2 - Red, With &#038; Blonde recently. It's not that the first movie, Legally Blond, was a masterpiece or antything, but it was good for what it was. It was a happy, shiny movie where you dismissed a little reality and just went with the story. Elle Woods (Reese Witherspoon) may be a silly character, but you go with it just to watch the character grow and mature. In addition, there were a nice assortment of memorable characters peppered thoughout the story that really "kicked it up a notch".
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0333780/combined"><img src="/images/posts/legally_blonde_2.gif" width="110" height="150" alt="Legally Blonde 2" border="1" hspace="6" align="left" /></a><strong>Director(s):</strong> <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0379237/">Charles Herman-Wurmfeld</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0013996/">Eve Ahlert</a>, <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0236882/">Dennis Drake</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0161285/">Kate Kondell</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Comedy<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> Rated PG-13 for some sex-related humor.<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 95 minutes<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2003</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Sassy postgrad Elle Woods is all about animal rights. In fact, she puts her nuptial plans on hold to head to Washington D.C. to get an anti-animal testing bill passed. Her building&#8217;s doorman quickly shows her the ways and workings of our nation&#8217;s capital.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> There is a curse in the movie industry. It&#8217;s name &#8211; the sequel. For some reason, trying to follow up a hit movie with a sequel is very difficult for most studios because most sequels suck eggs. I forgot about this curse when I rented Legally Blonde 2 &#8211; Red, With &#038; Blonde recently. It&#8217;s not that the first movie, <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0250494/combined">Legally Blonde</a>, was a masterpiece or anything, but it was good for what it was. It was a happy, shiny movie where you dismissed a little reality and just went with the story. Elle Woods (<a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0000702/">Reese Witherspoon</a>) may be a silly character, but you go with it just to watch the character grow and mature. In addition, there were a nice assortment of memorable characters peppered throughout the story that really &#8220;kicked it up a notch&#8221;.</p>
<p>Since Legally Blonde was a big hit, you&#8217;d think that the producers wouldn&#8217;t mess with the formula that made it such a success. Haven&#8217;t we learned anything from New Coke? <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Unfortunately all the elements that made the first movie such a fun guilty pleasure are absent from the sequel and all you&#8217;re left with is a bitter taste in your mouth making you feel wrong for liking the first movie.</p>
<p><span id="more-221"></span><br />
The biggest problem with the movie is the script. You can&#8217;t make a silk purse out of a sow&#8217;s ear and this script was dead on arrival. Instead of using the original writer, <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0527581/">Karen McCullah Lutz</a> , the studio chose Ahlert,  Drake and Kondell. Again, why miss with a winning combination? Anyway, the opening sequence is a scrapbook that the friends Margot (<a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0004814/">Jessica Cauffiel</a>) and Serena (<a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0005513/">Alanna Ubach</a>) are looking through. The device is meant to catch the viewer up on what&#8217;s been happening to Elle. This works nicely for those that didn&#8217;t see the first movie and for those of us that have, it works to set us back in place within the Elle timeline. At the end of the first movie, they said that Elle married Emmett Richmond (<a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0005561/">Luke Wilson</a>). At the start of the second film, they explain that the wedding hasn&#8217;t happened yet and is scheduled to happen soon. This choppy style of storytelling works well when used in this manner, unfortunately the entire movie is told in this fashion.</p>
<p>Instead of creating story arcs for the characters so that can grow and lead us through the story, we&#8217;re presented with chunky segments. It&#8217;s almost as if you&#8217;re watching &#8220;bits&#8221; from SNL or something. I can just see the writers pitching these ideas back and forth, &#8220;Hey, how about Elle goes to Washington? Yeah! And there&#8217;s this mean lady that runs the office. Yeah! And the door man is really cool and helps her. Yeah! And her fiancee comes to visit. Yeah! And <em>then</em> she&#8217;s on CSPAN. Yeah!&#8221; It was just scene after scene that didn&#8217;t develop anything. The comedy was forced and it felt as if everyone was just walking through their scenes.</p>
<p>Think I&#8217;m just being mean? Well, let&#8217;s look at the plot and then you can tell me. &#8220;Elle is getting married and she decides that she wants her dog, Bruiser, to have his parents at the wedding. She learns that Bruiser&#8217;s mother is being used for animal testing so she goes to Washington to pass a bill to outlaw animal testing.&#8221; That&#8217;s it. I&#8217;m not kidding. That&#8217;s really the plot. I know, who would have green lighted this kind of project?</p>
<p>As I saw the story unfold like someone dropping a sack of potatoes, I held out for the hope that the supporting characters would help redeem this movie. No such luck. Emmett the fiancee was reduced to a caricature of his former self. In the first movie Emmett helped ground the movie in reality. He wasn&#8217;t a doe eyed goof, he was the smart, sensible legal hero that sees Elle as a &#8220;diamond in the rough&#8221; and what potential she holds. In this movie, he&#8217;s nothing but a sycophant who does nothing more than say &#8220;Yes dear.&#8221; and mug for the camera. To add insult to injury, Paulette Bonafont&#233; (<a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0177639/">Jennifer Coolidge</a>) the lovable manicurist who is befriended by Elle in the first film, is reduced to nothing but the eccentric goofball sidekick who makes one stupid comment after another. Even <a href="http://imdb.com/name/nm0627878/">Bob Newheart</a>, as the doorman Sid Post,  couldn&#8217;t keep this ship afloat. All of the actors are credible in their field and are capable of doing so much more than this. The crime in all of this is that the script shackles them down to the point where they have no room to do what they do best &#8211; act.</p>
<p>With nary a chuckle throughout the whole film, I pulled up the &#8220;gag reel&#8221; from the Special Features section of the DVD. A gag reel is becoming a staple of DVDs and they are usually quite funny as they show goof ups and antics of the actors and crew as they were filming the movie. Normally you see the actors messing up lines and laughing uncontrollably, thus showing how much fun the movie was to shoot. On this gag reel, the actors barely crack a smile. When the gag reel of a comedy can&#8217;t make you laugh, what hope does the movie itself have?</p>
<p>I loved the first Legally Blonde movie. It was silly and somewhat of a farce, but the story and the characters made you just &#8220;go with it&#8221; and enjoy yourself. It wasn&#8217;t high film, it was just a good time. Legally Blonde 2 is such a disaster it makes you sorry you enjoyed the first one altogether. It truly is a crime. By the end of the film, all the affection you had for the characters is gone. You just don&#8217;t care about Elle anymore and you don&#8217;t care where she goes from there. She gives a knowing wink to the camera at the end of the film to imply that there could be a 3rd film and I my only hope is that the studio doesn&#8217;t get paroled to make it.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/2stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="2 out of 5 Stars" /> (2 Out Of 5 Stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review: [<a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0333780/usercomments-223">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2004/02/legally-blonde-2-red-white-blonde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Matrix Saga: Part Three &#8211; Enter The Matrix (Part One)</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-three-enter-the-matrix-part-one/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-three-enter-the-matrix-part-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2003 03:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love playing video games. I got hooked on the Atari 2600 and I've been playing them ever since, however when I heard that there was going to be a video game released based on The Matrix, I wasn't too thrilled. Typically, whenever there is a video game based on a movie, it sucks. I really like the Matrix Saga and although I've liked everything that the Wachowski brother's have touched, the suck factor was pretty high on a video game. Did I want to take the risk and buy the video game?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00007M5DZ/qid%3D1069790478/sr%3D8-3"><img src="/images/posts/enter_the_matrix.gif" width="108" height="150" alt="Enter The Matrix" border="0" hspace="6" align="left" /></a>I love playing video games. I got hooked on the Atari 2600 and I&#8217;ve been playing them ever since, however when I heard that there was going to be <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00007M5DZ/qid%3D1069790478/sr%3D8-3">a video game</a> released based on The Matrix, I wasn&#8217;t too thrilled. Typically, whenever there is a video game based on a movie, it sucks. I really like the Matrix Saga and although I&#8217;ve liked everything that the Wachowski brother&#8217;s have touched, the suck factor was pretty high on a video game. Did I want to take the risk and buy the video game?</p>
<p>You might be surprised that I did resist and didn&#8217;t run out and buy it the day it was released. I was tempted mind you, but the fact that most of the reviews were bad, I held off. I simply didn&#8217;t want to spoil my Matrix experience. After I watched <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0242653/combined">The Matrix Revolutions</a>, I was shopping at Target and I saw that they had it on sale for half price at $19.99. There&#8217;s only so much a man can take, so I bought it. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span id="more-179"></span><br />
<strong>Choose Your Poison</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00007M5DZ/qid%3D1069790478/sr%3D8-3">Enter The Matrix</a> was released for several consoles (Playstation2 and Gamecube) as well as for the PC. From what I understand the PC version is basically a port from the console. Ports always suck, because PC games is a good bit different from console gaming and vice versa. However, only the PC version of the game includes DVD quality video. From the reviews that I&#8217;ve read the console versions of the game rate higher than the PC version. In fact, X-Play recommended &#8220;<a href="http://www.techtv.com/xplay/reviews/story/0,24330,3446626,00.html">PC owners should stay far away at all costs</a>&#8220;.  I&#8217;m a PC gamer and I bought it more for the video clips than anything else, so I of course opted for the PC version of the game.</p>
<p><strong>So Why Buy It?</strong><br />
All the reviews I&#8217;ve read say that the game sucks, so why buy it? One reason and one reason only &#8211; <span style="color: red">there&#8217;s over and hour of DVD quality video in the game</span>. This video isn&#8217;t just snippets from the three films either. When the Wachowski&#8217;s shot footage for the video game as they were shooting <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0234215/combined">The Matrix Reloaded</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0242653/combined">The Matrix Revolutions</a>. So the video shot for the game is totally unique from the movie, for the most part, and the stories are entwined in what you see in the movies.</p>
<p>Do you have to play the video game in order to see the movies. No, just like <a href="http://www.mashby.com/archives/000316.html">The Animatrix</a>, you don&#8217;t <em>have</em> to have played the game in order to enjoy the movie. Yet, there are some very interesting story lines and back stories that you miss if you haven&#8217;t played it. This content enriches your movie experience. I equate it to watching your favorite television show. Take &#8220;<a href="http://www.nbc.com/Friends/">Friends</a>&#8221; for example. You can sit down and watch any episode of Friends and know what&#8217;s going on and have a good time watching it. Yet a lot of the enjoyment of the show is the fact that you know about Ross and Rachel&#8217;s past, or the fact that Monica used to be fat. When you know these back stories, things that happen in current episodes are more enjoyable. &#8220;We were on a break!&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean anything to you if you haven&#8217;t seen the previous episodes.</p>
<p><strong>How The Stories Are Entwined</strong><br />
We last left the Matrix Saga with <a href="http://www.mashby.com/archives/000316.html">The Animatrix</a>. The Osiris left a package in a drop box and it&#8217;s your job to go get it. To do this, you choose from two characters in which to play &#8211; Niobe (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000586/">Jada Pinkett Smith</a>), or Ghost (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0938931/">Anthony Wong</a>). In the movie Ghost is a minor character at best, so you may not even recognize his name. To play the game fully, it&#8217;s best to choose one character, play to the end of the game and then choose the other character and play again. Each character has special levels that are unique to them, so it&#8217;s not like you&#8217;re playing the same game twice.</p>
<p>The first segment involves going to the post office to collect the package. The second segment involves going to the airport to call all the other captains for the meeting that appears at the start of The Matrix Reloaded. I was very surprised to learn how the captains use the Matrix to leave messages for each other and there is some very funny dialog. While at the airport, you are called upon to save a fellow crew, which greatly expands the level. The third segment involves the meeting of the captains and the subsequent escape after the agents show up. In The Matrix Reloaded, we see Neo fight the agents, but we don&#8217;t see what happens with the rest of the characters. It&#8217;s a bit more expanded in the video game. After this third segment, I would recommend that you stop here and watch The Matrix Reloaded. Or at a minimum, watch The Matrix Reloaded, then play the game and then watch The Matrix Revolutions</p>
<p><strong>This Doesn&#8217;t Sound Like A Video Game</strong><br />
Dialog, DVD video clips, story arcs. This doesn&#8217;t sound like a video game does it? To be honest, it really isn&#8217;t. The Wachowski brothers used this medium to continue telling their story and that&#8217;s really where the game shines.  To illustrate just how much this video game is more like a movie experience than a gaming experience, the video game is listed in the <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0277828/combined">Internet Movie Database</a>.</p>
<p>Throughout the game you&#8217;re presented with the following elements:</p>
<p>1. Cinematics &#8211; through the use of DVD quality video, you see the story unfold with all the main characters from the Matrix Trilogy. They take a few short cuts with the special effects in places, but otherwise it&#8217;s the same quality of footage as the movies.</p>
<p>2. Animatics &#8211; to help transition you from the movie to the game, often times a cinematic with change into an animatic. This simply means that the story unfolds in an animated version using the game engine to render the characters. These cut scenes are just as engaging as the video because they use the actual actor&#8217;s voices.</p>
<p>3. Game Play &#8211; you do actually get to play the game as well. As either Niobe, or Ghost, you navigate your way through the game unfolding the story as you play.</p>
<p><strong>Speaking Of Game Play</strong><br />
It was no surprise to learn that the game play sucks. As a game, Enter The Matrix is dead on arrival. No matter how powerful your computer is, the game play is going to bog down to a crawl whenever there are a lot of enemies on the screen. The limited ability to save your games is going to cause you to scream more than once. Last but not least, the game play is simply not that engaging. It&#8217;s very linear and thus you&#8217;re really only going from point A to point B, press a button, or open a door and the level is over. I&#8217;ll be honest, as a game, it&#8217;s a turd.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not the point. The reason for this game is not for you to play it over and over like <a href="http://www.idsoftware.com/games/quake/quake3-arena/">Quake III</a>, or <a href="http://www.eagames.com/official/moh/alliedassault/us/">Medal Of Honor Allied Assault</a>. The purpose for this game is to tell a story. I don&#8217;t know that a video game is the best medium for telling a story, but I have to give the Wachowski brothers credit for the attempt. To show you that the Brothers simply want you to get to the end, if you get to a point where you can rest, your health will automatically increase. Not just a little at a time, but in 20 seconds you can go from 2% to 100% if you simply stand still (and no one is shooting at you).</p>
<p><strong>The Saving Grace</strong><br />
Other than the 1 hour of DVD quality video (have I said that enough yet?), the only saving grace is the audio in the game. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0204424/">Dane Davis</a>, the sound designer for the Matrix Trilogies used the exact sounds from the movies. So when you&#8217;re in bullet time and hearing the guns go off, it&#8217;s just like you&#8217;re there. It&#8217;s weird when the sound effects are the most notable aspects of a game, but they are that good.</p>
<p>The music is also excellent. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0204485/">Don Davis</a>, the composer for the Matrix Trilogies, composed music for the game as well. In addition, there are tracks from Juno Reactor, Chris Vrenna, Fluke, Rob D and others, that add a certain bit of adrenaline to the game play. Great songs to kick butt to.  <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>I Was Living It</strong><br />
Even though the game play is almost criminal, I have to say that some of the sections were quite fun. The kung fu was pretty good and I must confess that I got a real charge the first time I did a cartwheel in bullet time while shooting an M-16. Or the first time I ran sideways on a wall, did a flip and then kicked a SWAT guys ass. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Granted, this thrill is only last for about 15 minutes, but it was fun none-the-less.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re a die-hard Matrix fan, then I&#8217;d recommend buying the game if you can find it on sale. However, you don&#8217;t have to be a gamer to play this game. Simple button mashing will get you through the game and through all of the stories &#8211; which is the point of the whole game anyway. Even if you&#8217;re not a die-hard fan, the story arcs are good and worth slugging through the game to watch them.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating</strong><br />
<em>As a video game:</em> <img src="/images/2stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="2 out of 5 stars" /> (2 out of 5 stars)<br />
<em>As an immersive movie experience:</em> <img src="/images/4stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="4 out of 5 stars" /> (4 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review</strong> [<a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0277828/usercomments-35">link</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part One &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000307.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">The Matrix</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Two &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000316.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">The Animatrix</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>&#187; Part Three &#8211; Enter The Matrix (Part One)</strong><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Four &#8211; The Matrix Reloaded<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Five &#8211; Enter The Matrix (Part Two)<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Six &#8211; The Matrix Revolutions<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Seven &#8211; Lagniappe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-three-enter-the-matrix-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Matrix Saga: Part Two &#8211; The Animatrix</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-two-the-animatrix/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-two-the-animatrix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Matrix had a lot of firsts in it. The first movie to use bullet time, the first movie to bring comic book and anime storytelling to live action, etc. On it's own The Matrix is a landmark film and had the Wachowski brothers left it at that, it would have been enough. Little did we know in 1999 (the year the Matrix was released) that the brothers had much more in store for us.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0328832/"><img src="/images/posts/animatrix.jpg" width="99" height="140" alt="The Animatrix" border="1" hspace="6" align="left" /></a><strong>Director(s):</strong> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0161285/">Peter Chung</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1002475/">Andy Jones</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0442791/">Yoshiaki Kawajiri</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1238086/">Takeshi Koike</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0535340/">Mahiro Maeda</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0605479/">Kouji Morimoto</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0913860/">Shinichir&ocirc; Watanabe</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0905152/">Andy Wachowski</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0905154/">Larry Wachowski</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0161285/">Peter Chung</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0442791/">Yoshiaki Kawajiri</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0605479/">Kouji Morimoto</a>, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0913860/">Shinichir&ocirc; Watanabe</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Action / Drama / Animation / Sci-Fi<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> N/A, but intended for mature audiences<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 102 minutes<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2003</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Anthology of nine short anime (Japanese animation) films tied in to the 1999 blockbuster &#8220;The Matrix&#8221; and its sequels. &#8220;Final Flight of the Osiris&#8221;: The crew of the hovercraft Osiris attempt to warn their city of an imminent attack. &#8220;The Second Renaissance, Parts 1 &#038; 2&#8243;: The story behind the war between man and the machines, how mankind scorched the sky, and the creation of the Matrix. &#8220;Kid&#8217;s Story&#8221;: A teenager is contacted by Neo, and manages to escape the Matrix. &#8220;Program&#8221;: Two warriors battle in a samurai training simulation when one decides to betray his crewmates and re-enter the Matrix. &#8220;World Record&#8221;: A champion sprinter manages to break free of the Matrix by sheer physical effort during a record attempt. &#8220;Beyond&#8221;: A young girl searching for her cat discovers a haunted house caused by a glitch in the system. &#8220;A Detective Story&#8221;: Private investigator Ash tracks a hacker named Trinity through the looking glass. &#8220;Matriculated&#8221;: A group of humans capture a machine scout and insert it into a &#8216;human matrix&#8217;.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/combined">The Matrix</a> had a lot of firsts in it. The first movie to use bullet time, the first movie to bring comic book and anime storytelling to live action, etc. On it&#8217;s own The Matrix is a landmark film and had the Wachowski brothers left it at that, it would have been enough. Little did we know in 1999 (the year the Matrix was released) that the brothers had much more in store for us.</p>
<p><span id="more-178"></span><br />
While doing a press junket in Japan, the Wachowski brothers took the opportunity to meet some of the directors of their favorite anime series and movies. On the plane ride back they hatched the idea that they would go beyond just the next two films that were planned to finish the trilogy. They decided to include anime and video games as additional mediums to tell their story. To my knowledge, no director has ever done this and this marks yet another first in the history of film.</p>
<p>The Animatrix is a collection of short stories all told through animation. Most of the directors come from Japanese animation, or anime as it is typically called. For many viewers, this was their first introduction to anime. Titles such as <a href="http://www.futureblues.com/">Cowboy BeBop</a>, <a href="http://www.manga.com/ghost/ghost.html">Ghost In The Shell</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00004U5SA%3Fv%3Dglance">Blue Submarine No. 6</a> may be completely foreign to most American audiences, but with the Animatrix, they were being introduced to some of the best anime directors in the world.</p>
<p>Of the 9 segments contained in the Animatrix, only 4 of them were actually written by the Wachowski brothers. The other six were written by the Directors themselves. That being said, the Brothers did produce all of the segments to ensure that they other writers stayed true to the mythos of The Matrix. What the Wachowski brothers <em>didn&#8217;t do</em> however was direct any of the segments. They actually turned over the reigns to the anime directors themselves. Not many directors would have been this collaborative, but it just goes to show what huge fans of anime the two brothers are.</p>
<p>Now you might be thinking, &#8220;Well, this is just a cartoon, so what does it really matter?&#8221; Given the fact that they didn&#8217;t direct them and only wrote 4 of the 9 segments, the Animatrix, it might appear that this is just some marketing ploy, or some fanciful project that doesn&#8217;t relate to The Matrix Trilogy at all. That is not the case. The Animatrix contains stories that not only relate to the Matrix, but actually include story arcs that <em>tie directly into the movies</em>.</p>
<p>The following is a short breakdown of each segment and how it relates to The Matrix Trilogy:</p>
<p><strong>1. Final Flight Of The Osiris</strong><br />
This story is actually the start of The Matrix Reloaded. That&#8217;s right, if you want to know the whole story, you need to watch this before viewing Reloaded. The story is about the hovercraft The Osiris and their crew and their final mission. If you recall at the start of The Matrix Reloaded, Niobe (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000586/">Jada Pinkett Smith</a>) talks about scans that the Osiris took and why everyone is so worried. Do you <em>have</em> to see this segment of the Animatrix in order to understand what&#8217;s going on in The Matrix Reloaded? No, but if you want to know the whole story, then you do.  <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>This segment was directed by Andy Jones, the person behind the <a href="http://www.arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/01q3/ff-interview/ff-interview-1.html">Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within</a> movie and uses some of the most advanced CG animation in the world today. At times you forget that what you&#8217;re watching is animated and not live action.</p>
<p><strong>2 &#038; 3. The Second Renaissance Part I &#038; II</strong><br />
These segments tell the tale of how the Matrix came to be and fill the gaps between 1999 and when The Matrix takes place. Covering several 100 years, it provides a history and explanation of how the Machines came to take over.</p>
<p>The director for this segment is Mahiro Maeda, most known in the anime world for <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B00004U5SA%3Fv%3Dglance">Blue Submarine No. 6</a>, takes this mythology for the Matrix and does an excellent job blending in parallels to our own history. Certain scenes are stylized to Tiananmen Square, Vietnam and many other striking visuals from our history. I don&#8217;t know why they broke out the story into two segments, but they are both masterfully done.</p>
<p><strong>4. Kid&#8217;s Story</strong><br />
If you&#8217;ve already seen The Matrix Reloaded, then you&#8217;ve already met a new character named &#8220;Kid&#8221; who always seems to find Neo and tends to hang around a lot. In this segment, we learn about his back story and how he came to be unplugged from the Matrix. Although this is a back story, you hear Neo in The Matrix Reloaded refer to segment. So, although this story may be a back story, it is still tightly integrated with the rest of the Matrix Trilogy.</p>
<p>The director for this segment is Shinichiro Watanabe and he expanded on the original story provided by the Wachowski&#8217;s and uses a very old school and fluid style in this piece that works wonderfully for the story. Watanabe is most famous for <a href="http://www.futureblues.com/">Cowboy BeBop</a>, which was both a television show and later a movie</p>
<p>An interesting note: the actual actor who plays Kid in the movie (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1047143/">Clayton Watson</a>) does the voice over work. He&#8217;s not alone either as <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000206/">Keanu Reeves</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005251/">Carrie-Anne Moss</a> also provide voices for their characters Neo and Trinity as well.</p>
<p><strong>5. Program</strong><br />
One of the Wachowski&#8217;s favorite anime movies is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/6305014140%3Fv%3Dglance">Ninja Scroll</a>, which was directed by Yoshiaki Kawajiri. Serving as writer and director for Program, Kawajiri provides us with a segment that feels the closest to the Matrix movies themselves. They style used is more traditional anime and of all the segments, Program is the most authentic in the anime style.  All the other segments are going in new and exciting directions, but this one holds true to it&#8217;s roots and as a result has the strongest Matrix feel to it.</p>
<p>This is the first story in the Animatrix that doesn&#8217;t tie directly to the Matrix Trilogies, but it still has links to it and direct ones at that. I don&#8217;t wish to give anything away, but this is a must see on the DVD. Great story and great anime.</p>
<p><strong>6. World Record</strong><br />
This story was also written by Kawajiri, but was directed by a young animator named Takeshi Koike. Clearly heavily influenced by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0161285/">Peter Chung&#8217;s</a> work, World Record tells the story of a sprinter and how he comes to discover what the Matrix is. This segment is a side story and doesn&#8217;t connect, or relate to the movies, but does provide an interesting story. If you like the style <a href="http://www.who2.com/aeonflux.html">Aeon Flux</a> and don&#8217;t mind exaggerated characters, then you&#8217;re going to like this segment a lot.</p>
<p><strong>7. Beyond</strong><br />
Of all the segments, Beyond took the longest to produce taking close to 3 years to complete. That is do in large part to the director Koji Morimoto and his working style. However I don&#8217;t think the producers minded so much given the fact that they had the Animation Supervisor for the seminal film <a href="http://www.akira2001.com/">Akira</a> working on their project.</p>
<p>This story is a bit out there and deals with what happens when there&#8217;s a glitch in the Matrix. It&#8217;s masterfully animated and really sucks you into this world. I recommend viewing this segment more than once because there are a lot of little things that you might not catch the first time watching it. It&#8217;s a slower pace than what we&#8217;ve become accustomed to with the Matrix, but it&#8217;s an interesting story nonetheless.</p>
<p><strong>A Detective Story</strong><br />
Written and directed by Shinichiro Watanabe, Detective Story tells a stand alone tale about Trinity. Told in a film noir style, Wantanabe provides us with an interesting story about a detective hired to find Trinity. This story doesn&#8217;t tie in directly with the movies, but it&#8217;s a nice tight story and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0005251/">Carrie-Anne Moss&#8217;</a> dialog add an authenticity to it as well. One of my favorite segments.</p>
<p><strong>Matriculated</strong><br />
After another director had to drop off of the Animatrix project at the last minute, Peter Chung (of <a href="http://www.who2.com/aeonflux.html">Aeon Flux</a> fame) was brought in to contribute a story. Given that he didn&#8217;t have a lot of time and was brought in at the last moment, a lot of latitude was given to Chung and he delivers one of the trippiest stories on the DVD.</p>
<p>The concept for the story is what would it be like if we created a Matrix for the machines? The result is a psychedelic trip through the dreams and mind of humans and machines. Although I like Peter Chung&#8217;s work, this was my least favorite of all the segments. It made me think and ask a lot of questions, but the overall style of the piece is quite different from what we&#8217;ve come to expect from the Matrix. In other words, it seems to break the most rules</p>
<p>Besides the 9 segments themselves, the DVD is jam packed with bonus materials. There are director commentaries for 4 segments as well as a history of Anime and a &#8220;making-of&#8221; documentary as well. If you like bonus materials on a DVD, you won&#8217;t be disappointed in this one. There is also a package that includes a soundtrack to the Animatrix as well. The soundtrack is very good an includes some great techno music.</p>
<p>All in all, if you&#8217;re a fan of the Matrix, then this is a must have in your collection. Even if you&#8217;re not a huge fan of the Matrix it&#8217;s still worth a watch. The fact that the story for the Matrix Saga weaves excellently through the Animatrix, you don&#8217;t know the whole story if you haven&#8217;t seen this DVD. There are references to it in both The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions. You&#8217;re enjoyment of the movies will be that much more heightened as a result of it.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/4stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="4 out of 5 stars" />(4 out 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0328832/usercomments-87">link</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part One &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000307.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">The Matrix</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>&#187; Part Two &#8211; The Animatrix</strong><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Three &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000317.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">Enter The Matrix (Part One)</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Four &#8211; The Matrix Reloaded<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Five &#8211; Enter The Matrix (Part Two)<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Six &#8211; The Matrix Revolutions<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Seven &#8211; Lagniappe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-two-the-animatrix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Matrix Saga: Part One &#8211; The Matrix</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-one-the-matrix/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-one-the-matrix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The movie that started it all. The Matrix came completely out of the blue. No one had ever heard of the directors, the Wachowski brothers. Their only other movie directorial effort was Bound, which no one ever saw. (Turns out, Bound was simply an audition to prove to the studios that they knew how to direct and could handle the project that was The Matrix). The actors were a mixed bag of good actors (Laurence Fishburne, Joe Pantoliano), bad actors (Keanu Reeves) and then unknown actors (Carrie-Ann Moss and Hugo Weaving). The previews gave nothing away. You were simply left with the question "What Is The Matrix?" and a few images of some very cool action. The only thing I knew at the time was that I HAD to go see the movie the night it was released.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/"><img src="/images/posts/the_matrix.jpg" width="99" height="140" alt="The Matrix" border="1" hspace="6" align="left" /></a><strong>Director(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0905152/">Andy Wachowski</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0905154/">Larry Wachowski</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0905152/">Andy Wachowski</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0905154/">Larry Wachowski</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Action / Sci-Fi<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> R<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 136 minutes<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 1999<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> The Fight for the Future Begins</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> In the near future, a computer hacker named Neo (Keanu Reeves) discovers that all life on Earth may be nothing more than an elaborate facade created by a malevolent cyber-intelligence, for the purpose of placating us while our life essence is &#8220;farmed&#8221; to fuel the Matrix&#8217;s campaign of domination in the &#8220;real&#8221; world. He joins like-minded Rebel warriors Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) and Trinity (Carrie Ann Moss) in their struggle to overthrow the Matrix.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> The movie that started it all. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/">The Matrix</a> came completely out of the blue. No one had ever heard of the directors, the Wachowski brothers. Their only other movie directorial effort was <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0115736/">Bound</a>, which no one ever saw. (Turns out, Bound was simply an audition to prove to the studios that they knew how to direct and could handle the project that was The Matrix). The actors were a mixed bag of good actors (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000401/">Laurence Fishburne</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0001592/">Joe Pantoliano</a>), bad actors (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000206/">Keanu Reeves</a>) and then unknown actors (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0005251/">Carrie-Ann Moss</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0915989/">Hugo Weaving</a>). The previews gave nothing away. You were simply left with the question &#8220;What Is The Matrix?&#8221; and a few images of some <em>very cool</em> action. The only thing I knew at the time was that I HAD to go see the movie the night it was released.</p>
<p><span id="more-176"></span><br />
Before I go any further, I need to make a confession. I am the target demographic for this movie. As such, my opinion of this movie is biased from the word <em>go</em>. I love video games, I like kung fu, I like science fiction, I like comic books, and I like technology. The one overwhelming mantra of The Matrix is that the Wachowski brothers use everything, pop culture, religion, video games, you name it and blend it all together to make something new. Since they used all the things that I like already, the movie was a wicked cocktail that hooked me from the instant I tasted it. I loved the story, the action, the cinematography, even the acting.</p>
<p>Fishburne and Joey Pants are great character actors and I tend to love their work regardless of the film their in. Keanu Reeves is a different story. Other than the <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0096928/">Bill &#038; Ted</a> movies, Keanu&#8217;s acting hasn&#8217;t been all that good. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0113481/">Johnny Mnemonic</a> was a bomb in no small part thanks to Keanu&#8217;s lack of skill as an actor. He&#8217;s stiff, doesn&#8217;t convey a lot of emotion and his delivery is stilted. His main redeeming quality is that he looks good. All his negatives became positives in the Wachowski&#8217;s hands. The character of Neo is one where you need someone stiff and emotionless, but looks good as he&#8217;s kicking butt. Keanu more than fits the bill. This was the role he was meant to play.</p>
<p>The story was good, but the story<em>telling</em> was the hallmark for me.  For many people the cinematography was all new to them. Some people had never seen camera angles like they found in the Matrix, but I had in comic books and in Japanese Animation aka <a href="http://www.animenation.com/">anime</a>. In comic books, the method of storytelling is done through still images. Although that may sound somewhat stilted, it can actually give some freedom because each frame and show you more detail, slow things down, or speed things up. If anything it gives you a wide latitude with perspective. Anime takes a similar approach because much of anime is done on such a small budget. For example, one trick that anime uses is to take a still image and have the &#8220;camera&#8221; move from left to right. This gives the impression of movement, but it&#8217;s really just a single still image. These tricks created an entire style that anime still uses today even though the budget may be bigger.</p>
<p>The Wachowski&#8217;s came from <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.11/matrix.html?pg=2&#038;topic=&#038;topic_set=">a comic book background</a>, and one of the things that they were trying to do was bring some of the storytelling style from comic books and anime to the silver screen. Trinity&#8217;s jump, bullet time, and the fight between Neo and Agent Smith in the subway are all examples of 2d comic book and Japanese anime style that was realized in film. Motion pictures, comic books and animation are all simply mediums to tell a story. The Wachowski brothers blended the styles and blurred the lines between the mediums.</p>
<p>The techniques that the director&#8217;s used in the Matrix changed film as we know it. Hardly any action movie today doesn&#8217;t use kung fu wire work. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0160127/">Charlie&#8217;s Angels</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0327850/">The Rundown</a>, and even <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0237534/">Le Pacte des Loups</a> all used the fighting style made popular in The Matrix. Star Wars may have been a landmark movie because it changed how science fiction was done, but The Matrix did that and more. The ripple effect of this movie has left it&#8217;s mark on so many filmakers that it&#8217;s hard to watch any action or science fiction film and not see touches of The Matrix in them.</p>
<p>In 1999 the Wachowski brothers released a landmark film that changed film, and to some extent our culture, forever. It came out of the blue and blew us all away. It would be four years before their story could continue, but it was all worth the wait.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/5stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="5 out of 5 stars" />(5 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0133093/usercomments-2998">link</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong>&#187; Part One &#8211; The Matrix</strong><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Two &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000316.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">The Animatrix</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Three &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000317.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">Enter The Matrix (Part One)</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Four &#8211; The Matrix Reloaded<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Five &#8211; Enter The Matrix (Part Two)<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Six &#8211; The Matrix Revolutions<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&#187; Part Seven &#8211; Lagniappe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/11/the-matrix-saga-part-one-the-matrix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tank, I Need An Exit</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/11/tank-i-need-an-exit/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/11/tank-i-need-an-exit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 04:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is the day. The day that I've been pining for months to come. Today is the launch of The Matrix Revolutions. I was given three tickets to the premier in IMAX format on my birthday and they've been locked away until today. I can't wait!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/woo_hoo.gif" width="86" height="113" alt="Woo Hoo" border="0" hspace="6" align="left" />Today is the day. The day that I&#8217;ve been pining for months to come. Today is the launch of <a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0242653/">The Matrix Revolutions</a>. I was given three tickets to the <a href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/7172424.htm">premier in IMAX format</a> on my birthday and they&#8217;ve been locked away until today. I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p>From what I understand, the movie is <a href="http://www.thelouisvillechannel.com/entertainment/2611123/detail.html">being released simultaneously around the world</a> and has been released in regular and IMAX format at the same time. These are two things that have never been done before in the history of cinema. IMHO The Matrix has now eclipsed Star Wars in terms of it&#8217;s impact on cinema. I think it occurred prior to this launch, but Revolutions seals the deal.<br />
When I went to go see The Matrix Reloaded I was expecting long lines and got there extra early only to find out that there were so many showings that there was no need. However, since I&#8217;m going to the IMAX release, I think I&#8217;ll need to get there extra early to make sure I have a good seat. <a href="http://www.npug.org">NPUG</a> is having an informal mini-meeting this month at the IMAX release, so perhaps I&#8217;ll have some help in reserving my place in line. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I went to go see <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0327056/">Mystic River</a> on Saturday and saw the trailer and I can&#8217;t tell you how hard it was not to scream out &#8220;F&#8217;in A Baby!!!&#8221; after the trailer ended. I was mouthing the all the words while it was playing like that girl in the Diet Coke commercial. I&#8217;m as giddy as a schoolgirl and as hooked as a crack addict. I need my fix &#8211; I need an exit! <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/11/tank-i-need-an-exit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matrix Overloaded</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/10/matrix-overloaded/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/10/matrix-overloaded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's hard to believe, but the third installment of The Matrix trilogy is almost upon us. It seems like just yesterday I was just frothing at the mouth to see The Matrix Reloaded and to be quite honest I thought my excitement for the final chapter to be somewhat waning. Of course that's before I saw the Ultra Theatrical Trailer.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/matrix_revolutions.gif" width="150" height="223" alt="The Matrix Revolutions Movie Poster"  align="left" hspace="6" border="0" />It&#8217;s hard to believe, but the third installment of The Matrix trilogy is almost upon us. It seems like just yesterday I was just <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000059.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">frothing at the mouth</a> to see <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&#038;path=tg/detail/-/B0000AXE8I/qid%3D1065132551/sr%3D8-1">The Matrix Reloaded</a> and to be quite honest I thought my excitement for the final chapter to be somewhat waning. Of course that&#8217;s before I saw the <a href="http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/rv_cmp/rev_ultra_warning.html">Ultra Theatrical Trailer</a>. </p>
<p>The Wachowski brothers never cease to amaze me. When the maximum quicktime preview that you can normally see is 640 x 480, they go and realease a <strong>better than DVD quality</strong> 1024 x 532 102MB file. Although I had seen the other three television trailers, I was totally unprepared for this ultra theatrial trailer. I&#8217;m not lying when I say this, after I watched it&#8230; I wept. </p>
<p>I may be the target demographic for these movies and simply acting out a pavolvian response, but I think Andy and Larry are cinematic geniuses. Regardless if you are a fan of their movies or not, they have done more to alter the future of visual arts than any other directors in history. Forget the fact that there hasn&#8217;t been an action scene in a movie that hasn&#8217;t been influenced by The Matrix, it seems that almost everything has been touched in some way. From advertising to eyeware, to even <a href="http://www.neilpryde.com/product/2003/matrix03/tech.html">windsurfing</a>. So I know that it can&#8217;t just be me that these movies resonate with can I?</p>
<p><span id="more-136"></span><br />
In watching the trailer, it was the perfect bait to reset the hook. I&#8217;m now just as crazy about seeing the third as I was to see the first. Yet this time, I get to see this one in <a href="http://www.imax.com/films/now_playing/matrix_revolutions.html">IMAX format the night of it&#8217;s premier</a>! How cool is that? So with green code pumping through my veins once more, I downloaded the cool <a href="http://www.uselesscreations.com/matrix/">screensaver</a>, scoured <a href="http://www.whatisthematrix.com/">The Matrix web site</a> and even watch the spoof <a href="http://www.tylka.com/downloads/A_Glitch_in_the_Matrix_(lg).mov">A Glitch In The Matrix</a>. At one point, I had to go back to the source and watch all the previews again. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://mashby.com/images/matrix_overloaded.jpg?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">picture of my desktop</a> in all it&#8217;s glory. Warning it&#8217;s over 1MB in size.</p>
<p>So now I&#8217;m all dressed up with no where to go. The itch has started and I have to wait till November 5th, a little more than 30 days away, before I can scratch it. Am I the only one itching, or do I have compatriots sharing my affliction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/10/matrix-overloaded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under The Tuscan Sun</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/09/under-the-tuscan-sun/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/09/under-the-tuscan-sun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 12:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you love Italy then go see this movie. If you like real and intelligent characters then go see this movie. If you hate romantic comedies then go see this movie.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/under_the_tuscan_sun.jpg" width="100" height="134" alt="Double Jeopardy" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0920108/">Audrey Wells</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm1217227/">Frances Mayes</a> (Book), <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0920108/">Audrey Wells</a> (Screenplay)<br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Romantic Comedy<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> PG-13<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong><br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2003<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong>  Life offers you a thousand chances&#8230; all you have to do is take one.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Loosely based on Frances Mayes&#8217;s best-selling memoir of the same title, Diane Lane stars as Frances, a newly divorced American lawyer who heads for the Italian region of Tuscany to make limonita out of life&#8217;s lemons. Having just quit her high-pressure job and ended her heartbreaking marriage, she buys a decrepit-but-charming house in Cortona on impulse, rebuilding it piece by piece &#8212; and herself along with it.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> If you love Italy then go see this movie. If you like real and intelligent characters then go see this movie. If you hate romantic comedies then go see this movie.</p>
<p>I am not a huge fan of the romantic comedy genre. More often than not, a romantic comedy is nothing more than a few good looking people thrown together and saddled with a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&amp;path=tg/detail/-/B0000897EG/qid%3D1063979202/sr%3D-1">lousy script</a>. That&#8217;s not to say that there aren&#8217;t notable exceptions, but for the most part <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&amp;path=tg/detail/-/B00003CXSM/qid%3D1063979323/sr%3D8-5">they suck</a>. Based on the previews for this movie, I didn&#8217;t have high hopes, however I did receive a free pass to watch a sneak preview for the movie, so how could I say no? <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span id="more-121"></span><br />
Having not read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=mashbycom-20&amp;path=tg/detail/-/0767900383/qid%3D1063976941/sr%3D8-1">the book</a>, I really didn&#8217;t know what to expect. Let me tell you it was a pleasant surprise. For starters, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0000178/">Diane Lane</a> was the perfect choice for the lead character Frances Mayes. She brings a natural reality to the character, instead of the saccharin sweet typically found in a romantic comedy. Diane instantly makes you feel like you know this woman. She&#8217;s your neighbor, or someone you work with. In the scene after she learns of her husband&#8217;s infidelities, she looks horrible &#8211; exactly like you&#8217;d expect like a woman would look after traumatic news. Of course Diane Lane is a very beautiful woman and as the movie progresses that becomes more and more apparent. Luckily Diane is more than just a pretty face and her performance is stellar. The movie as a whole is understated, letting things play out instead of spelling everything out and Diane provides a wonderful tapestry for you to <em>see</em> what is happening to her. Her reactions tell you more than pithy dialog ever could and as a result you end up taking the journey with her.</p>
<p>As much as I loved Diane Lane in this movie, she is surrounded by an incredible supporting cast. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0644897/">Sandra Oh</a>, as the best friend, delivers an authentic performance. Instead of the typical &#8220;funny sidekick&#8221; so often played by those in the role of best friend, she&#8217;s down to earth and real. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0100556/">Raoul Bova</a> plays the Italian lover and should make most women weak in the knees, but I found <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0725664/">Vincent Riotta</a>, the real estate agent, to be a much richer character. And speaking of rich characters, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0242026/">Lindsay Duncan</a> plays a wonderful eccentric as Katherine who almost serves as a fairy godmother.</p>
<p>Although the acting is surpurb, what brings it all together are the talents of <a href="http://us.imdb.com/name/nm0920108/">Audrey Wells</a> who serves as the screenplay writer, director and producer. Most of Audrey&#8217;s background has been in writing. This is only her second film as a director, yet you wouldn&#8217;t know it by watching the film. Clearly Ms. Wells has a love of Italy and a love of the novel and all of that shows on the screen. She filmed in the cities that are represented and she hired actors that are the nationality in which they play and the age in which they should be. The entire films shines with authenticity and coupled with wonderful performances and directing, Audrey has redefined the romantic comedy.</p>
<p>This movie was refreshing, witty, poetic, dramatic and rich with characters that you not only like, but identify with. It was such a breath of fresh air that I&#8217;m ready to see it again and again. This film is <em>definitely</em> going into my DVD collection.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/4stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="4 Stars" /> (4 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</a> [<a href="http://imdb.com/title/tt0328589/usercomments-175">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/09/under-the-tuscan-sun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punk&#8217;d</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/06/punkd/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/06/punkd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2003 12:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Matrix Reloaded was finally released in IMAX format, so yesterday after church, we headed over to Opry Mills to the Regal Cinema Opry Mills 20 IMAX theatre. It happened on a bit of a lark, I just happened to notice that there was a 2:15 showing while glancing at the Nashville Scene as I rode in the back seat of my Mother's car. We got out of Church at 1:00pm, so it seemed like a perfect fit. Go to church and then go see the movie.

We arrived at Opry Mills at about 1:15pm, so we had about 30 minutes before they began seating. We took the opportunity to browse Barnes &#038; Nobel. Going in I couldn't think of anything that I wanted. I had purchased all my magazines for the month and I'm already reading 3 books, so I didn't need another. That's before I found out that they sold DVDs as well. I ended up purchasing the The Animatrix Boxed Set, which includes the Animatrix DVD and the Animatrix soundtrack. It was turning into a Matrix day.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/imax.gif" width="134" height="192" alt="The Matrix Reloaded - In IMAX Format" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" />The <a href="http://www.fandango.com/movie_page.asp?mv=67522&amp;remotefilter=REGL">Matrix Reloaded</a> was finally released in <a href="http://www.imax.com">IMAX</a> format, so yesterday after church, we headed over to <a href="http://www.oprymills.com/">Opry Mills</a> to the <a href="http://www.fandango.com/theater.asp?distance=30&amp;chain_id=REGL&amp;theater_id=AAOPJ_LIVE">Regal Cinema Opry Mills 20 IMAX theatre</a>. It happened on a bit of a lark, I just happened to notice that there was a 2:15 showing while glancing at the <a href="http://www.nashscene.com/">Nashville Scene</a> as I rode in the back seat of my Mother&#8217;s car. We got out of Church at 1:00pm, so it seemed like a perfect fit. Go to church and then go see the movie. <br />
We arrived at Opry Mills at about 1:15pm, so we had about 30 minutes before they began seating. We took the opportunity to browse <a href="http://www.bn.com">Barnes &#038; Nobel</a>. Going in I couldn&#8217;t think of anything that I wanted. I had purchased all my magazines for the month and I&#8217;m already reading 3 books, so I didn&#8217;t need another. That&#8217;s before I found out that they sold DVDs as well. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . I ended up purchasing the <a href="http://www.intothematrix.com/">The Animatrix Boxed Set</a>, which includes the Animatrix DVD and the Animatrix soundtrack. It was turning into a Matrix day.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a long time since I&#8217;ve seen an IMAX movie. The last one I saw was &#8220;<a href="http://www.imax-sa.com/alamo.html">The Alamo</a>&#8221; when Holly and I were celebrating our 2nd Anniversary in San Antonio. I&#8217;ve certainly never seen a feature film released in the format, so I was VERY excited and intrigued in what the differences would be between the 35mm experience and the IMAX Experience.</p>
<p><span id="more-62"></span><br />
The first difference I noticed was the ticked prices. We were going to an early movie, which usually warrants a discount of a few dollars. Normally, a film at this theatre runs $8.50 a person. If you go to an early show, the price is $6.50. A ticket to the IMAX was $11.50. Ouch! Oh well, it&#8217;s the Matrix, its worth it right? Of course!</p>
<p>So, while Holly stood in line to get some popcorn, I hustled inside to get us a good seat and as soon as I entered the theatre I was awestruck &#8211; the screen is HUGE! As I tripped over my tongue, I found three good seats just to the right in the middle row in the middle of the theatre. These were near perfect seats and as I sat there, I noticed the second difference in an IMAX movie. The music.</p>
<p>Most cinemas have gone to the same &#8220;<a href="http://www.ncninc.com/products/movietunes.htm">movie tunes</a>&#8221; music that they play before the trailers. It reminds me of &#8220;Eckerd Radio&#8221; from back in the day when I worked at <a href="http://www.eckerd.com/">Eckerd Drugs</a> as a kid. Eckerd&#8217;s was one of the first companies that I can recall to begin using the music they played in the store to market to their customers. They played music, but in between they would hawk their own goods and services. Since I worked there, listening to &#8220;Eckerd Radio&#8221; drove me insane. Since then, I have a keen ear to that type of marketing drivel and I don&#8217;t enjoy it in the least. So, instead of &#8220;movie tunes&#8221; the IMAX theatre was playing music from movie soundtracks. VERY COOL. I couldn&#8217;t place any distinct theme, but it was obvious that the music came from a movie. But it gets even better.</p>
<p>On top of the great music, they didn&#8217;t have those stupid <a href="http://www.ncninc.com/products/onscreen.htm">Coca-Cola trivia slides</a> that they play before the previews. The slides aren&#8217;t near as bad as the &#8220;movie radio,&#8221; but I&#8217;ve really grown tired of them. At this point I had a sudden rush of glee. If they don&#8217;t have the &#8220;music radio,&#8221; or the Coca-Cola trivia slides, then that might mean; no it can&#8217;t possibly mean that; or can it? Sure enough, it was true &#8211; <a href="http://mashby.com/archives/000083.html?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">NO COMMERCIALS</a>.</p>
<p>My hunch was correct. Instead of commercials, we were greeted by a voice over the P.A and then a brief presentation about what IMAX is and some staggering stats. For example, the projector uses two massive Xeon bulbs to project the image on the screen and just one of those bulbs could be seen from the moon if pointed out to space. Funny the things you remember huh?</p>
<p>There was one preview for an IMAX formatted movie coming in December and then it began. Although in IMAX format, the film was shown in letterbox style, meaning that there were black bars at the top and the bottom of the screen. Had we not seen the preview, I don&#8217;t think it would have been noticeable, but the preview used the full length and width of the screen. Even with this little change, it didn&#8217;t matter. O H   M Y   G O D, did it look good.</p>
<p>I saw &#8220;The Matrix Reloaded&#8221; on opening day and I didn&#8217;t think it could get any better, but it did. Seeing the credits in large screen format made you feel as if you were swimming into the screen. In fact, I was glad that I had persuaded Holly to take a <a href="http://www.dramamine.com/">Dramamine</a> because she gets motion sick quite easily and this movie was about to take us for a ride. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My jaw hit the floor during Trinity&#8217;s first fight scene and I couldn&#8217;t wipe the smile off of my face when Neo&#8217;s first fight scene started. Well, that is until the movie stopped. ???</p>
<p>Right during the middle of Keanu&#8217;s first fight scene the projector went out. Black screen with audio for a few seconds and then nothing. Zip. Nada. Bupkiss. Our friendly voice from the introduction came back on (I thought that was recorded) to say that they were having some technical difficulty and that it would be a few minutes. Everyone started talking for about 5 or so minutes, cracking wise and still giddy from the first 15 minutes of the movie &#8211; that is until the &#8220;voice&#8221; came back on to let us know that the movie was not coming back and that we could get a movie pass, or a refund and that they were sorry.</p>
<p>It was like being in the throws of passion and having your Mom walk in. Here we were all hyped up and in the moment only to have cold water thrown on us. It was unthinkable and everyone got up and walked out like zombies. That was the worst tease I have ever experienced in my life. For the next 30 minutes, all I could do is walk around with this big-eyed expression on my face and say things like &#8220;Man!&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/ShowMainServlet/showid-17441/">punk&#8217;d</a>&#8221; Of course I opted for pass instead of a refund because I am DEFINITELY going back to see it when the projector is fixed. Until then, I&#8217;ll have to nurse my wounds with the Animatrix and dream in big screen format. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/06/punkd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$@#*ing Commercials</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/06/ing-commercials/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/06/ing-commercials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2003 03:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is one thing that has reared its ugly head in American cinema in the past year that just sticks in my craw are movie theatres showing commercials. Don't get me wrong, I love commercials and dearly miss AdCritic and wish it would come back to its "Internet Bubble" heyday. But I don't mind commercials on TV because they are subsidizing what I'm watching. I don't pay for network TV so I understand the role that commercials play. However when I go to a movie and pay $8.50 a person the last thing that I expect to see is a freakin' commercial. I paid a fee to watch commercials? I don't think so. Yet with each movie that I go to see, more and more commercials are appearing prior to the previews. I saw the Italian Job today and was subjected to no less than 7 commercials.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/bachelor_chow.gif" border="0" alt="Bachelor Chow - Now With Flavor!" hspace="6" width="74" height="117" align="left" />If there is one thing that has reared its ugly head in American cinema in the past year that just sticks in my craw are movie theatres showing commercials. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I love commercials and dearly miss <a href="http://www.adcritic.com">AdCritic</a> and wish it would come back to its &#8220;Internet Bubble&#8221; heyday. But I don&#8217;t mind commercials on TV because they are subsidizing what I&#8217;m watching. I don&#8217;t pay for network TV so I understand the role that commercials play. However when I go to a movie and pay $8.50 a person the last thing that I expect to see is a freakin&#8217; commercial. I paid a fee to watch commercials? I don&#8217;t think so. Yet with each movie that I go to see, more and more commercials are appearing prior to the previews. I saw the <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0317740">Italian Job</a> today and was subjected to no less than <strong>7 commercials</strong>.</p>
<p>Some people might argue that previews are really just commercials for movies. Well, that&#8217;s true, but its part of the movie experience, ads for Degree antiperspirant are not. Or you might argue that commercials are defraying the cost of movies. Bollocks. When was the last time you saw a movie theatre go out of business? Besides, movie attendance is higher than ever and when the Matrix Reloaded can pull in over 200 million in one weekend I don&#8217;t think theatres are hurting. Also, don&#8217;t forget that the gross movie sales do not include the cost of popcorn and other snacks. By my own rough estimation, I&#8217;d say that for every two tickets at $8.50 there&#8217;s at least $8.50 spent at the concession stand. So, when a movie pulls in $200 million, there&#8217;s roughly $100 million that goes straight to the movie theatre. That&#8217;s not counting the money made from the Coca-Cola ads, etc.</p>
<p><span id="more-61"></span><br />
The bottom line? I paid $8.50 for admission to watch a movie, not $8.50 to watch commercials. Unfortunately, in this ad crazy society that we live in, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to change. The American culture is saturated in advertising. Don&#8217;t think so, well then here&#8217;s something to chew on. Microsoft has been developing <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1041-999509.html">the iLoo</a> &#8211; a port-a-potty with an Internet connection that can feed ads and other content while you&#8217;re doing your business. I kid you not. Although the idea was <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/30686.html">eventually scrapped</a>, it just goes to show you that advertising is everywhere and only getting worse.</p>
<p>Now going to the movie theatre isn&#8217;t much better than watching it at home and to follow the logic, then there is LESS of a reason for me to go to the theatre. Movies are being released within 6 months of theatrical release and to be totally honest, I can download most movies released today on the Internet. If going to the movie theatre provides me with nothing more than a big screen, because the rest of the experience has been diminished, then I might as well watch it at home. I might not do that today, but the introduction of commercials to me is a slippery slope and that day may not be too far off.</p>
<p>So, do I think that commercials will disappear from cinema? Absolutely not. Now that it&#8217;s here, it&#8217;s going to stay and no one is going to do anything because the public at large is numb to advertising and won&#8217;t even notice. My alternative? To sit and bitch about it and rant in my weblog. <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/06/ing-commercials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reloaded And Re-spent</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/05/reloaded-and-re-spent/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/05/reloaded-and-re-spent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2003 15:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/reloaded.gif" width="150" height="175" alt="My ticket stub" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" />After a 4 year wait, the <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0234215">Matrix Reloaded</a> finally arrived. Not since <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0080684">The Empire Strikes Back</a> have I lusted for a movie sequel. Given that I was only 13 when the <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0076759">Star Wars</a> sequel was released, suffice to say that I didn&#8217;t know what lust was. So, you can imagine how much I&#8217;ve been waiting for this movie to be released! <img src='http://mashby.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> <br />
As soon as <a href="http://www.fandango.com">Fandango</a> had the tickets for sale 3 weeks ago, I bought two for the 7:00pm show at the <a href="http://www.fandango.com/theater.asp?distance=30&amp;chain_id=REGL&amp;theater_id=AAIWP_LIVE">Regal Green Hills 16</a>. With all the hype surrounding the movie, I aimed to be there two hours before to pick up my tickets. Unfortunately, I couldn&#8217;t pull away from work that early, so it was 5:45pm before I got to the theatre. I had visions of long lines and hard core fans <a href="http://www.phillyburbs.com/halloween2001/budgetbusters/matrix.shtml">dressed up</a> as Neo and Trinity. I even packed my digital camera so that I could record it, so imagine my surprise when I arrived at the theatre and there was NO ONE in line. I walked right up to the ticket booth and picked up my tickets. When I looked at the board, only the 9:30pm show was sold out. I was flabbergasted. How could this movie not be sold out for all shows?</p>
<p>After entering the main lobby of the theatre I ambled around waiting for a line, SOMETHING to indicate that I wasn&#8217;t insane. It took about 30 minutes, but a line finally started to develop, when I went up to stand in line, that&#8217;s when the ticket taker informed me that this was for the 6:15pm show. That&#8217;s when I learned that there were shows at least every 30 minutes, which explains why many of them weren&#8217;t sold out. Then, when the 7:00pm line finally started, the person in front of me explained that they began showing the movie on the 14th at 10:00pm and again every half hour until midnight &#8211; that explained why there wasn&#8217;t anyone dressed up. Ahhh, my fanatic love for the Wachowski brothers was redeemed!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to review the movie, I&#8217;ll save that for the <a href="http://mashby.com/movies/?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">movie section</a>, but I have to say that the Matrix Reloaded was a great movie. Although there&#8217;s been some <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0234215/board/nest/1512627">negative comments</a> here and there, the movie delivers exactly what it promised. It&#8217;s first and foremost and action movie. Action movies don&#8217;t have the best dialog, or the best acting per se. Not every movie is <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0108052">Schindler&#8217;s List</a> and to go into this movie expecting that is an idiot. The Matrix Trilogy holds true to the style of Japanese Animation (anime), Japanese Comics (manga), American comics and computer games. Add a heaping spoonful of Kung-Fu and you have all the major ingredients. But, like any dish, if you don&#8217;t care for the ingredients, then you&#8217;re not going to enjoy the meal. I for one am ready for a second helping! The movie blew me away. <em>In the voice of Austin Powers</em> &#8211; I&#8217;m spent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/05/reloaded-and-re-spent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Jeopardy</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/05/double-jeopardy/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/05/double-jeopardy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 04:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Predictable, shallow and without any flavor.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/double_jeopardy.jpg" width="100" height="134" alt="Double Jeopardy" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Beresford,%20Bruce">Bruce Beresford</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Weisberg,%20David%20(I)">David Weisberg</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Cook,%20Douglas%20(I)">Douglas Cook</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Thriller<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> R<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 105 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 1999<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong>  Murder isn&#8217;t always a crime.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Framed for her husband&#8217;s murder, Libby Parsons (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Judd,%20Ashley">Ashley Judd</a>) survives the long years in prison with two burning desires sustaining her: finding her son and solving the mystery that destroyed her once-happy life.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> Predictable, shallow and without any flavor. That is how I would characterize this movie. You&#8217;ve seen it before and you know what&#8217;s coming throughout the entire movie. I feel like a patrol cop telling the crowd &#8220;keep moving, there&#8217;s nothing to see here.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ashley Judd gives another lackluster performance as a well-to-do wife who gets sent to prison for 6 years. You&#8217;d think she was sent to the time out corner instead. Judd portrays the same character leaving prison as she DOES when she enters. Wait, I take that back. Her character does do some sit ups to prove that she&#8217;s tough now. Please. %)</p>
<p><span id="more-48"></span><br />
And you&#8217;d think this was another in the <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0106977">Fugitive</a> series like <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0120873">US Marshalls</a> was. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Jones,%20Tommy%20Lee">Tommy Lee Jones</a> needs to watch out that he doesn&#8217;t make another movie where he&#8217;s chasing a convict, or that&#8217;s all he&#8217;s going to be known for. Jones is a great character actor, and I love his work, but nothing he can do can help this lame duck of a script.</p>
<p>The final nail in the coffin for me was the finale, which is shot in New Orleans. I&#8217;m from Louisiana, so perhaps I&#8217;m more sensitive than most, but few movies get the accents right. One of the few movies that come to mind that does get it right is <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0116508">Heaven&#8217;s Prisoners</a>. Suffice to say that Double Jeopardy butchers the accent. Not to mention the fact that everything is set in the French Quarter, as if that&#8217;s the only thing IN New Orleans.</p>
<p>Overall, this film is nothing but a series of cliches and cop outs. None of the characters have any depth. They are simply cardboard cutouts set against a paper thin story. If you&#8217;re looking for a movie to pass the time, or if you need to pacify a teenager for an hour and a half, then this is your movie.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/2stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="2 Stars" /> (2 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0150377-260">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/05/double-jeopardy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magnolia</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/magnolia/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/magnolia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 04:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overall, this film is a movie lover's feast. A feast full of rich a delectable tastes. Dig in.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/magnolia.jpg" width="100" height="134" alt="Magnolia" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Anderson,%20Paul%20Thomas">Paul Thomas Anderson</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Anderson,%20Paul%20Thomas">Paul Thomas Anderson</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Drama<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> R<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 188 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 1999<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> Things fall down. People look up. And when it rains, it pours.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> From director Paul Thomas Anderson comes a mosaic of American life woven through a series of comedic and poignant vignettes. Through chance, human action, past history and divine intervention, an eclectic cast of characters (including <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Cruise,%20Tom">Tom Cruise</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Moore,%20Julianne">Julianne Moore</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Macy,%20William%20H.">William H. Macy</a> and more) weaves and warps through each other&#8217;s lives on a random San Fernando Valley day, building an unforgettable climax.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> This movie is not for the faint of heart. I made the mistake of starting this movie at 10:30pm thinking that it&#8217;d be the usual 1.5 hour movie. I should have looked at the sleeve more closely, this movie is over 3 hours long. Not to mention the fact that Anderson pushes the boundaries of storytelling by interweaving a multitude of characters to tell one story, or message. This is a &#8220;thinking man&#8217;s&#8221; movie and not something to just flip through like  so many movies released today.</p>
<p><span id="more-44"></span><br />
The script is great, but Anderson has also put together a fantastic cast to bring it to life. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Reilly,%20John%20C.">John C. Reilly</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Hoffman,%20Philip%20Seymour">Philip Seymour Hoffman</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Hall,%20Philip%20Baker">Philip Baker Hall</a> are some of the best character actors around and they just light up the screen. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Cruise,%20Tom">Tom Cruise</a> who gives a stand out performance as Frank T.J. Mackey (host of an infomercial called &#8220;Seduce and Destroy&#8221;), <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Moore,%20Julianne">Julianne Moore</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Macy,%20William%20H.">William H. Macy</a> round out the cast and bring a little star power along with them. But there are a ton of more actors in this ensemble piece, such as <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Robards,%20Jason">Jason Robards</a>, but the list is simply too long to list.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so hard to review this film, simply because it is told in such a unique way. All of the characters are connected to one another in some way shape and form and Anderson uses a variety of styles to tell the story. In fact, at one point, it&#8217;s almost a music video as all of the major characters lip sync to one of the cuts from the soundtrack. This movie is funny, sad, poignant, and absurd. It&#8217;s simply one of those films that you&#8217;ll be talking about days after seeing it, still trying to put all the pieces together. Overall, this film is a movie lover&#8217;s feast. A feast full of rich a delectable tastes. Dig in.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/4stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="4 Stars" /> (4 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0175880-1063">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/magnolia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>City of Ghosts</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/city-of-ghosts/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/city-of-ghosts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 02:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really wanted to like this movie, but it just falls flat.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/city_of_ghosts.jpg" width="92" height="140" alt="City Of Ghosts" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Dillon,%20Matt">Matt Dillon</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Dillon,%20Matt">Matt Dillon</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Gifford,%20Barry">Barry Gifford</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Thriller<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> R<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 116 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2002<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> Where you go when you can&#8217;t turn back.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Jimmy Cremming (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Dillon,%20Matt">Matt Dillon</a>) is headed to Bangkok, where he hopes to hide out after getting tangled in an insurance fraud investigation. While there, he discovers that his mentor and partner in crime, Marvin (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Caan,%20James">James Caan</a>), is in Cambodia with the loot. All Jimmy wants is his fair share ? but the closer he gets to Marvin and his world, the crazier &#8212; and more dangerous &#8212; life turns.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> I really wanted to like this movie, but it just falls flat. I had the opportunity to view this at a pre-screening in New York. <a href="http://www.palm.com">Palm, Inc.</a> was sponsoring the event and I was lucky enough to be invited. Given the pre-party and the potential for celebrities to attend (there were none), I was pretty hyped. Loving movies like I do, this was the one of the best of all possible worlds in which to see this movie &#8211; it didn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p><span id="more-43"></span><br />
&#8220;City of Ghosts&#8221; is Matt Dillion&#8217;s first shot at directing and writing a film and it shows. The main character, Jimmy Cremming, is supposed to be this un-trusting scam artist that&#8217;s been trained in it all his life. That may sound good on paper, but you have to demonstrate it on the screen and Dillion simply refused to show his character as un-sympathetic. If the character has grown up grifiting and scamming then there should be some evidence of it in his demeanor at least and there just isn&#8217;t. As a result, the main character has no story arc. Although he is supposedly going through a transformation, there is no evidence of it.</p>
<p>None of the major characters have any depth or range to them either. James Cann walked through this role, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Skarsg%E5rd,%20Stellan">Stellan Skarsgard</a> does nothing but play a drunk and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?McElhone,%20Natascha">Natascha McElhone</a> was nothing but eye candy. A lot of good talent that was simply wasted. There were two notable exceptions. Two actors were able to brake out of the bad script enough to create a character that you could actually care for. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Depardieu,%20G%E9rard">Gerard Depardieu</a> plays a very funny inn keeper/bartender. His role could have been almost forgotten, yet instead Depardieu instilled such humor and compassion in his role that it&#8217;s one of the more memorable. The other actor was <a href="?phpMyAdmin=4843181771c5de8e42505cd954dd4482">Kem Sereyvuth</a>, who plays Sok, the local rickshaw operator who takes a liking to Jimmy Cremming and vice versa. Sereyvuth may have been type casted a bit in his role, I don&#8217;t know much about him, but his portrayal is honest and sincere. You get the feeling that they found the actor pulling a rickshaw and gave him a job. I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s not the case, but it&#8217;s a testimony to his acting ability.</p>
<p>There is one facet of the movie that I greatly enjoyed and that was the portrayal of Cambodia. I have traveled some, but I&#8217;ve never been to Cambodia. Having said that, I got the feeling that I had truly traveled there. The use of music and the almost documentary style of the cinematography in the early portions of the movie transports you into another place. Hats off to <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Denault,%20Jim">Jim Denault</a> for giving the film a distinct visual feel that gives the viewer something to chew on.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/2stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="2 Stars" /> (2 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0164003-10">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/city-of-ghosts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wedding Planner, The</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/wedding-planner-the/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/wedding-planner-the/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2003 03:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, this movie just fell below my already low expectations.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/wedding_planner.jpg" width="92" height="140" alt="The Wedding Planner" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Shankman,%20Adam">Adam Shankman</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Falk,%20Pamela">Pamela Falk</a> and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Ellis,%20Michael%20(IV)">Michael Ellis</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Romantic Comedy<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> PG-13<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 103 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2001<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> A romantic comedy about love, destiny and other events you just can&#8217;t plan for.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Mary Fiore (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Lopez,%20Jennifer">Jennifer Lopez</a>) is a very successful wedding planner. She is very organized and wants to control everything. During a chance encounter she meets the man of her dreams Steven James &#8216;Steve/Eddie&#8217; Edison, M.D. (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?McConaughey,%20Matthew">Matthew McConaughey</a>). It&#8217;s only later when she realizes that she Steve is the groom in the biggest wedding of her career. Will she let him walk down the isle with his tycoon fiancee, or will she break the cardinal rule of wedding planning by falling in love with the groom?</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> This is one of those movies that you rent/watch for your significant other. I rented it for Holly since most of my movies as of recent have been mostly for me. However, I tried to keep an open mind and give it a fair shake. Unfortunately, this movie just sucked. First time director and first time screenwriters, what can you expect?</p>
<p><span id="more-36"></span><br />
The script was just not believable. I know that romantic comedies have the liberty of taking some license here and there, but I just didn&#8217;t buy so much of this movie that the whole thing just seemed fake. For starters, we&#8217;re supposed to believe that Jennifer Lopez is an Italian immigrant? Come on! Her father (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Rocco,%20Alex%20(I)">Alex Rocco (I)</a>) doesn&#8217;t sound Italian, he sounds retarded. I don&#8217;t even know why she had to be an immigrant. There was nothing in the plot that required her being from another country, except for the fact that her father trys to arrange a marriage, which was just another unnecessary plot device. There&#8217;s just so much that was wrong with this script, I&#8217;m just amazed that the leading actors signed on to this project.</p>
<p>The talent in this movie was fairly decent. Jennifer Lopez and Matthew McConaughey had some chemistry and they looked good together. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Najimy,%20Kathy">Kathy Najimy</a> is a wonderful comedic actress and her scene with Jennifer was very good and believable. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Willard,%20Fred">Fred Willard</a>, and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Pollak,%20Kevin">Kevin Pollak</a> are the other actors that do comedic roles extremely well, but their talents were simply not tapped. They did what they could, but they simply had nothing to work with. IMHO I think Jennifer Lopez signed on because she was friends with Adam Shankman (he&#8217;s a choreographer) and once she signed on, everyone else jumped on board for their resume.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/2stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="2 Stars" /> (2 out of 2 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0209475-175">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/wedding-planner-the/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Hour Photo</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/one-hour-photo/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/one-hour-photo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2003 02:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the movie is a bit stylized and somewhat sterile in it's storytelling, it's a very engaging movie.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/one_hour_photo.jpg" width="94" height="140" alt="One Hour Photo" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Romanek,%20Mark">Mark Romanek</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Romanek,%20Mark">Mark Romanek</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Thriller<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> R<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 96 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2002<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> There&#8217;s nothing more dangerous than a familiar face.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> Seymour &#8216;SY&#8217; Parrish (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Williams,%20Robin">Robin Williams</a>) is a one hour photo lab technician at a SavMart discount pharmacy. His entire world is based around this job and he takes it very seriously. His perspective on the rest of the world is based on the snapshots that he views through his customers photographs. Of course, these photos only show the good times, because no one takes photos of things that they would like to forget. He has taken a keen interest in the Yorkin family and has followed their life through their snapshots. He envisions himself in many of their photos, because their life looks so idyllic. However, the Yorkin&#8217;s life isn&#8217;t as perfect as it appears in their snapshots and Sy&#8217;s world comes crashing down as he uncovers their imperfections.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> I&#8217;m a big fan of Mark Romanek&#8217;s work as a <a href="http://www.markromanek.com/videos.html">video director</a>. I think he&#8217;s a lighting genius and his hyper reality style makes the artist look ultra-perfect. Mark bring this artistic style to his directorial debut. Although I&#8217;m a big fan of it, I did find it a bit distracting in a movie format. According to the director&#8217;s commentary on the DVD, his intention was to make the movie somewhat hyper realistic, but everything is just a bit too squeaky clean.</p>
<p><span id="more-34"></span><br />
Yet, this fits the story somewhat, in that the characters are somewhat stereotypical. The dialog is fairly good, but in some of the more deeper sections, the dialog is a bit lacking. The relationship between the Mrs. Yorkin (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Nielsen,%20Connie%20(I)">Connie Nielsen</a>) and the Mr. Yorkin (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vartan,%20Michael">Michael Vartan</a>, of <a href="http://abc.abcnews.go.com/primetime/alias/">Alias</a> fame) is one of the weaker points of the movie. They simply didn&#8217;t have much in the way of chemistry and their relationship wasn&#8217;t clearly established. You know that they have problems in their relationship, but it&#8217;s vague and un-authentic.</p>
<p>The standout performance has to go to Robin Williams. What was most impressive about his work in this film was his ability to condense himself into such a quiet and contained character. We all know him as this over-the-top extrovert and in this role he is supposed to blend into the background, which he does. When he blows his gasket, which you know he&#8217;s going to do, you imagination just runs wild. He&#8217;s such a lonely character in such need for some type of contact that you just feel for him.</p>
<p>Another performance that surprised me was that of <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Smith,%20Dylan%20(III)">Dylan Smith</a>, who plays the Yorkin&#8217;s son Jake. His role wasn&#8217;t all that large, but he really did well in it. You could tell he was really listening when he was in scene and he did a lot of small movements, like playing with a toy somewhat distractedly, that just seemed so natural. This was his first role in a movie, but you wouldn&#8217;t know it from watching him work.</p>
<p>Although the movie is a bit stylized and somewhat sterile in it&#8217;s storytelling, it&#8217;s a very engaging movie. That coupled with the lighting and other eye candy is why I gave it 4 stars.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/4stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="4 Stars" /> (4 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0265459-385">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/one-hour-photo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Count Of Monte Cristo, The</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/count-of-monte-cristo-the/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/count-of-monte-cristo-the/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's a good Saturday movie if you want to watch some guys sword fight a little bit and not have to think to much.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/count_of_monte_cristo.jpg" width="92" height="140" alt="The Count Of Monte Cristo" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><br />
<strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Reynolds,%20Kevin%20(I)">Kevin Reynolds</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Dumas%20p%E8re,%20Alexandre">Alexandre Dumas P&#232;re</a> (novel), <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Wolpert,%20Jay">Jay Wolpert</a> (screenplay)<br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Action / Adventure<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> PG-13<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 131 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA / UK<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2002<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> Prepare for adventure. Count on revenge.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong><br />
A beautifully photographed rekindling of the classic Alexandre Dumas story. Edmond Dantes&#8217; (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Caviezel,%20James">Jim Caviezel</a>) life and plans to marry the beautiful Mercedes (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Dominczyk,%20Dagmara">Dagmara Dominczyk</a>) are shattered when his best friend, Fernand (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Pearce,%20Guy">Guy Pearce</a>), deceives him. After spending 13 miserable years in prison, Dantes escapes with the help of a fellow inmate (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Harris,%20Richard">Richard Harris</a>), cleverly insinuates himself into the French nobility and plots his revenge.</p>
<p><span id="more-33"></span><br />
<strong>Review:</strong> Well, there&#8217;s one thing that&#8217;s hard to go wrong with and that&#8217;s a classic story. It&#8217;s hard to fault the plot, when it&#8217;s based on a renowned classic like Dumas&#8217; The Count Of Monte Cristo, even if it is a simple revenge tale. Unfortunately, none of the acting rises above the page.</p>
<p>None of the leading men are quite manly. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Caviezel,%20James">James Caviezel</a> who plays Edmond Dantes and <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Pearce,%20Guy">Guy Pearce</a>, who plays Fernand Mondego both come across a little weak as swashbucklers. Caviezel tends to be a blank slate anyway, but I really liked Pearce in <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Title?0209144">Memento</a>, so I was a little disappointed to see his be such a weak character. You do dislike Fernand Mondego and want to see him meet his demise, but Pearce could have taken it much further and given Caviezel more distance to grow as a character. Richard Harris may have walked through this role, but he delivers the best performance of all the actors.</p>
<p>Overall, it&#8217;s a good Saturday movie if you want to watch some guys sword fight a little bit and not have to think to much.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/3stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="3 Stars" /> (3 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0245844-315">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/count-of-monte-cristo-the/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Am Sam</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/i-am-sam/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/i-am-sam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2003 05:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better have a box of Kleenex for this one.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/i_am_sam.jpg" width="92" height="140" alt="I Am Sam" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Nelson,%20Jessie">Jessie Nelson</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Johnson,%20Kristine">Kristine Johnson</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Nelson,%20Jessie">Jessie Nelson</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Drama<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> PG-13<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 132 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2001<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> love is all you need</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong><br />
Sam (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Penn,%20Sean">Sean Penn</a>) is a grown man with the mental capacity of a 7-year-old. After fathering a child with a homeless woman, Sam raises the baby himself until an incident at a birthday party finds the Child Protective Services deeming him an unfit guardian. With the help of yuppie lawyer <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Pfeiffer,%20Michelle">Michelle Pfeiffer</a>, Sam attempts to regain custody of his daughter and prove that, despite his handicap, he&#8217;s a truly loving father.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> Better have a box of Kleenex for this one.</p>
<p>I saw this movie the same weekend that I saw John Q and I have to say that this was on the exact opposite end of the spectrum even though it&#8217;s in the same genre! How is it on the opposite? Simply put, the emotions that it illicit are genuine.</p>
<p><span id="more-31"></span><br />
Just from reading the plot above, I think it&#8217;s fair to say that that there is a high chance that this movie could be a simple sob story that goes for the cliche in order to get you to cry. That NEVER happens in this film. Every emotion, although sometimes gut wrenching, is elicited genuinely from the actors and the story. I should also mention that I grew up next door to a mentally challenged neighbor, so I have had experience with the subject. Although Sam is clearly at the upper end of the spectrum in terms of mental deficiency, Penn nails the role and I think it&#8217;s one of the best performances of his life. Playing the role of a retarded person is not easy. It&#8217;s not just a matter of talking funny, or acting stupid &#8211; Penn clearly illustrates that fact. Not to mention that he&#8217;s able to hold the screen acting opposite a child and 5 dogs!</p>
<p>In conjunction with Penn&#8217;s performance, the writing is truly incredible. It&#8217;s realistic and doesn&#8217;t portray any of the characters as caricatures of themselves. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Schiff,%20Richard">Richard Schiff</a>, for example, could have been portrayed as simply &#8220;the bad guy&#8221; in his role as Turner, State&#8217;s Attorney. It would have been an easy choice for the writer&#8217;s to make and unfortunately, it&#8217;s a choice that many movies tend to make. Instead, Turner is portrayed as someone doing his job and looking out for the best interests of the child. Although it&#8217;s one of the more minor roles of the film, the fact that none of characters were &#8220;throw away&#8221; just goes to how how well the script was written.</p>
<p>One other element that is often overlooked is the cinematography. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Davis,%20Elliot">Elliot Davis</a> really gives this movie a unique style and feel in his photography and actually plays a role in telling the story. As the color pallets change for the perspective it makes it easier to tell where the perspective has changed as well. One of my favorite scenes involves the Sam in the courtroom and Davis&#8217; use of 4 cameras to capture the scene coupled with <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Chew,%20Richard">Richard Chew&#8217;s</a> editing makes that scene so compelling.</p>
<p>Lastly, I have to mention the performances given by the lead women in the cast. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Pfeiffer,%20Michelle">Michelle Pfeiffer</a>, who plays Sam&#8217;s lawyer Rita Harrison, gives one of her best performances in her career. The arc that she is able to take her character is not easy. She goes from being someone who has very little in the way of redeeming qualities to someone you can deeply care for. She really stretched herself in this role and took some chances that pay off in spades. And last, but not least, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Fanning,%20Dakota">Dakota Fanning</a> plays Sam&#8217;s daughter Lucy. I haven&#8217;t seen Dakota in any other films yet, but now I want to. Although playing a child, when you&#8217;re a child isn&#8217;t much of a stretch, having to play a child that understands the mentally challenged is. The script gives her everything she needs for the scene, but Dakota has to deliver it and she does. Her talent is well beyond her years and the emotion she is able to convey through her eyes and in her reactions to other characters is truly impressive. Her role could have been the weak link that brought the movie to a much lower level, but she proved to be one of it&#8217;s anchors.</p>
<p>Make no mistake about it, this is a tear jerker, but in the best sense of the word. It&#8217;s an honest look at a unique situation that shows us many facets and pulls no punches.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/5stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="5 Stars" /> (5 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0277027-252">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/i-am-sam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Q</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/john-q/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/john-q/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, John Q goes for the easy cliche almost every time.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/john_q.jpg" width="92" height="140" alt="John Q" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Cassavetes,%20Nick">Nick Cassavetes<br />
</a><br /><strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Kearns,%20James%20(II)">James Kearns</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Drama / Thriller<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> PG-13<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 116 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2002<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> Give a father no options and you leave him no choice.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong><a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Washington,%20Denzel">Denzel Washington</a> plays John Q, a luckless blue-collar workingman without the insurance needed to cover his son&#8217;s emergency heart transplant. Driven to desperation, he holds a hospital&#8217;s emergency room hostage until doctors agree to perform the operation. <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Woods,%20James">James Woods</a> and <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Heche,%20Anne">Anne Heche</a> are a couple of stubborn hospital staffers. <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Duvall,%20Robert">Robert Duvall</a> plays a no-nonesense hostage negotiator and Ray Liotta is a gung ho police chief in this gripping story about the possible consequences of real social ills.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> I delayed watching this movie from the simple fact that the previews gave me the impression that this was a &#8220;squashed squirrel.&#8221; There are two ways to elicit emotion: 1) provide a cliche device, such as a squashed squirrel (who won&#8217;t go &#8220;awwww&#8221; when seeing a small animal hurt?), or 2) earn your audience emotions by providing them with honest writing and believable situations. Unfortunately, John Q goes for the easy cliche almost every time.</p>
<p><span id="more-30"></span><br />
<a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Washington,%20Denzel">Denzel Washington</a> is an excellent actor and try as he might, he simply can&#8217;t escape from the script. At every turn he&#8217;s handed another maudlin easy out. And that&#8217;s really a shame because the topic addresses some fairly tough questions. There was real opportunity to provide a rich story filled with interesting dialog regarding the U.S healthcare system. Instead we&#8217;re presented with stereotypes of the &#8220;rich doctor,&#8221; the &#8220;mean hospital administrator&#8221; and the &#8220;gung ho cop.&#8221; Been there, done that and I didn&#8217;t care to see it the first time.</p>
<p>Major talent is wasted as well. <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Duvall,%20Robert">Robert Duvall&#8217;s</a> character, Lt. Frank Grimes, doesn&#8217;t have enough material to even be effective as cast member. At the end of the movie, I was left wondering why we even needed his character &#8211; he had no arc and provided no real insight to the drama. Duvall is a fantastic character actor and he&#8217;s given nothing to work with.</p>
<p>The rest of the cast is mostly a mixed bag of good and bad. All <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Elise,%20Kimberly">Kimberly Elise</a> can do is play anger as Denise Archibald, John&#8217;s wife. Her performance was disappointing since her character had the most to work with. <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Woods,%20James">James Woods</a> and <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Heche,%20Anne">Anne Heche</a> can likewise do little in their roles than play the stereotypes that they&#8217;ve been given. However <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Griffin,%20Eddie">Eddie Griffin</a> did standout as one of the more honest characters as Lester Matthews, one of the hostages. Granted, his role didn&#8217;t require much of a stretch, but it was a breath of fresh air and one of the few redeeming elements of the movie.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that <a href="http://yoursay.imdb.com/Name?Kearns,%20James%20(II)">James Kearns</a>, the writer and co-producer, simply provided nothing but a sow&#8217;s ear to the cast and no amount of magic was going to turn it into a silk purse. Kearns&#8217; work may have been appropriate for &#8220;Jake and the Fatman&#8221;, or &#8220;Highway to Heaven&#8221;, (he wrote for both TV series), but it simply wasn&#8217;t up to snuff for the cadre of talent on the playbill.</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/2stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="2 Stars" /> 2 out of 5 stars<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0251160-265">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/john-q/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death To Smoochy</title>
		<link>http://mashby.com/2003/04/death-to-smoochy/</link>
		<comments>http://mashby.com/2003/04/death-to-smoochy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ashby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mashby.com/wp/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an odd little film. It's funny, but in an off-center kind of way.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/images/posts/death_to_smoochy.jpg" width="92" height="140" alt="Death To Smoochy" align="left" hspace="6" border="0" /><strong>Director:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?DeVito,%20Danny">Danny DeVito</a><br />
<strong>Writer(s):</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Resnick,%20Adam">Adam Resnick</a><br />
<strong>Category:</strong> Comedy<br />
<strong>MPAA:</strong> R<br />
<strong>Runtime:</strong> 109 min<br />
<strong>Country:</strong> USA / UK / Germany<br />
<strong>Language:</strong> English<br />
<strong>Year:</strong> 2002<br />
<strong>Tagline:</strong> Get ready for an unexpected hit.</p>
<p><strong>Plot:</strong> <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?DeVito,%20Danny">Danny DeVito</a> directs this dark comedy set in the dog-eat-dog world of children&#8217;s television. Kids&#8217; show star Rainbow Randolph (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Williams,%20Robin">Robin Williams</a>) gets fired over a bribery scandal and is replaced by Smoochy (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Norton,%20Edward">Edward Norton</a>) &#8212; a puffy, purple rhinoceros. When Randolph discovers Smoochy is having an affair with Randolph&#8217;s ex-lover Nora (<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Keener,%20Catherine">Catherine Keener</a>), a top programming executive at the network, he plots his revenge.</p>
<p><strong>Review:</strong> This is an odd little film. It&#8217;s funny, but in an off-center kind of way. If you found <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Details?0137523">Fight Club</a> funny (which I thought it was in parts), then you&#8217;ll probably find this movie funny as well. Not that they are the same in context, just that their humor is similar in the oblique way at which they approach it.</p>
<p>This is clearly a dark comedy that envelopes itself into a style that is much like the children&#8217;s television shows they produce. In fact, I&#8217;d venture to say that the style of this film is almost comic book in nature. The lighting is very stark and solid in it&#8217;s choice of colors and the characters are almost ripped from the pages of a Dick Tracy comic book, albeit a more modern one.</p>
<p><span id="more-27"></span><br />
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Williams,%20Robin">Robin Williams</a> gives a very funny performance as a homo-repressed over-the-top children&#8217;s TV host and delivers his comedy in his characteristic rapid fire delivery. It&#8217;s classic Robin Williams. <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Norton,%20Edward">Edward Norton</a> shows us yet another side to his character acting skills as a meek and mild, cleaner than clean wannabe children&#8217;s television host. His opening scene performing at a heroin clinic is just classic, &#8220;Let&#8217;s face it. Big junkies come from little junkies. We gotta nip this in the bud, Burke!&#8221;. Yet Norton plays Smoochy with a bit of a hidden dark edge that keeps you thinking he&#8217;s going to pop at any moment. It just keeps the energy of the film always at a high rev.</p>
<p>Another notable performance was <a href="http://us.imdb.com/Name?Stewart,%20Jon">Jon Stewart</a>. He plays Marion Frank Stokes, a producer and overall sleaze. He did surprisingly well considering he was acting opposite Edward Norton and Robin Williams! Some of the best parts though are in the out takes at are in the &#8220;Special Features&#8221; section of the DVD. I encourage you to watch the out takes if for nothing else than to see him hold is improv ground again Williams. I always knew Jon was fast, but he&#8217;s really able to go toe-to-toe with one of the masters of improv. Some really funny stuff.</p>
<p>Overall, Death To Smoochy is Mr. Rogers, meets The Simpsons, meets Ren and Stimpy. It&#8217;s a farcical romp through a very distorted view of children&#8217;s television that will have you laughing in that fun, but un-comfortable way. Especially when you hear Smoochy sing&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Smoochy:</strong> [<em>Singing</em>] He slams the door He stomps his feet He sends me to bed with zilch to eat But my stepdad&#8217;s not mean he&#8217;s just adjusting.</p>
<p><strong>Smoochy:</strong> [<em>Speaking</em>] So you see, kids, a stepfather is just like a new puppy. He needs love and care. Remember though, if your stepdad is EVER abusive towards YOU or MOMMY, what&#8217;s the magic numbers?</p>
<p><strong>Kids:</strong> 9-1-1!</p>
<p><strong>Smoochy:</strong> Thaaaaaaat&#8217;s right!&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>My Rating:</strong> <img src="/images/3stars.gif" width="55" height="12" alt="3 Stars" /> (3 out of 5 stars)<br />
<strong>My IMDB Review:</strong> [<a href="http://comments.imdb.com/CommentsShow?0266452-218">link</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mashby.com/2003/04/death-to-smoochy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
